THE MORE WE DIE, THE MORE WE SELL? A SIMPLE TEST OF THE HOME-MARKET EFFECT

被引:27
作者
Costinot, Arnaud [1 ]
Donaldson, Dave [1 ,2 ]
Kyle, Margaret [3 ,4 ]
Williams, Heidi [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Ctr Econ & Policy Res, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] MINES ParisTech, Paris, France
[4] Ctr Econ & Policy Res, Washington, DC USA
[5] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; ECONOMIC-GEOGRAPHY; INCREASING RETURNS; PRODUCT DIFFERENTIATION; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; SIZE; DEMAND; INNOVATION; PATTERN; SCALE;
D O I
10.1093/qje/qjz003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The home-market effect, first hypothesized by Linder (1961) and later formalized by Krugman (1980), is the idea that countries with larger demand for some products at home tend to have larger sales of the same products abroad. In this article, we develop a simple test of the home-market effect using detailed drug sales data from the global pharmaceutical industry. The core of our empirical strategy is the observation that a country's exogenous demographic composition can be used as a predictor of the diseases that its inhabitants are most likely to die from and, in turn, the drugs they are most likely to demand. We find that the correlation between predicted home demand and sales abroad is positive and greater than the correlation between predicted home demand and purchases from abroad. In short, countries tend to be net sellers of the drugs they demand the most, as predicted by Linder (1961) and Krugman (1980).
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 894
页数:52
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Market size in innovation: Theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Linn, J .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (03) :1049-1090
[2]   Inter-industry trade in manufactures: Does country size matter? [J].
Amiti, M .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1998, 44 (02) :231-255
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, MORE WE DIE MO UNPUB
[4]   Increasing returns and all that: A view from trade [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Trefler, D .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (01) :93-119
[5]   SILICON VALLEY LOCATIONAL CLUSTERS - WHEN DO INCREASING RETURNS IMPLY MONOPOLY [J].
ARTHUR, WB .
MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1990, 19 (03) :235-251
[6]   Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules [J].
Azoulay, Pierre ;
Zivin, Joshua S. Graff ;
Li, Danielle ;
Sampat, Bhaven N. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (01) :117-152
[7]   Returns to scale in US production: Estimates and implications [J].
Basu, S ;
Fernald, JG .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1997, 105 (02) :249-283
[8]   Beyond the home market effect: Market size and specialization in a multi-country world [J].
Behrens, Kristian ;
Lamorgese, Andrea R. ;
Ottaviano, Gianmarco I. P. ;
Tabuchi, Takatoshi .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 79 (02) :259-265
[9]  
Bilir Kamran, 2018, 22160 NBER
[10]   A test of trade theories when expenditure is home biased [J].
Bruelhart, Marius ;
Trionfetti, Federico .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 53 (07) :830-845