Patient Satisfaction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An 8-Year Outcome Study

被引:168
作者
Djohan, Risal [1 ]
Gage, Earl
Gatherwright, James
Pavri, Sabrina
Firouz, Jimmy
Bernard, Steven
Yetman, Randall
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Plast Surg, Inst Dermatol & Plast Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
AREOLA COMPLEX; SUBCUTANEOUS MASTECTOMY; NEOPLASTIC INVOLVEMENT; REDUCTION MAMMAPLASTY; CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; DETERMINANTS; PRESERVATION; SENSIBILITY; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ccdaa4
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy has become an accepted treatment for appropriately selected breast cancers. No reports have correlated patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy with objective observer assessments. Methods: From 2001 to 2008, nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction were performed on 141 patients. After institutional review board approval, patients completed questionnaires rating their satisfaction with various aspects of their nipple-areola complex using a Likert-type scale. Three independent observers then reviewed the nipple-areola complex in 34 patients and rated the outcome using the same scale. Results: The survey completion rate was 53 percent and the mean follow-up was 50.4 months (range, 9 to 100 months). A majority of patients rated appearance, symmetry, color, position, and texture as good or excellent. A majority of patients rated sensation and arousal as fair or poor. Fifty-seven patients (73.1 percent) stated they would definitely undergo nipple-sparing mastectomy again. Patients with larger volumes of breast tissue removed (p = 0.010), larger preoperative body mass index (p = 0.034), or larger tissue expander volumes (p = 0.007) reported lower satisfaction. Patient assessments for appearance, color, symmetry, and position correlated with those of objective observers. Conclusions: The authors' study is the largest series to address patient satisfaction with the nipple-areola complex following nipple-sparing mastectomy and the only one to correlate patient self-assessment with assessment by independent observers. Overall, patients were very satisfied with appearance of the nipple-areola complex and most would choose nipple-sparing mastectomy again. A majority of patients rated sensation as fair or poor, with sensation constituting the most frequent aspect of the nipple-areola complex that patients would change. Larger body mass index, expander volumes, and volume of breast tissue removed may predict dissatisfaction postoperatively. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 125: 818, 2010.)
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 829
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   INVOLVEMENT OF THE NIPPLE AND AREOLA IN BREAST-CANCER - VALUE OF CLINICAL FINDINGS [J].
ANDERSEN, JA ;
GRAM, JB ;
PALLESEN, RM .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1981, 15 (01) :39-42
[2]   Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction [J].
Andrade, WN ;
Baxter, N ;
Semple, JL .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 107 (01) :46-54
[3]   The impact of obesity on patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction [J].
Atisha, Dunya M. ;
Alderman, Amy K. ;
Kuhn, Latoya E. ;
Wilkins, Edwin G. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 121 (06) :1893-1899
[4]   Preservation of nipple-areola complex in breast cancer - a clinicopathological assessment [J].
Banerjee, Ambar ;
Gupta, Sandipan ;
Bhattacharya, Nirjhar .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2008, 61 (10) :1195-1198
[5]   Revision in autologous breast reconstruction: Principles and approach [J].
Beahm, Elisabeth K. ;
Walton, Robert L. .
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2007, 34 (01) :139-+
[6]   Touch sensibility in the breast after subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with a prosthesis [J].
Benediktsson, KP ;
Perbeck, L ;
Geigant, E ;
Solders, G .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 50 (06) :443-449
[7]   Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality [J].
Bowling, A .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 27 (03) :281-291
[8]   Nipple sparing subcutaneous mastectomy: Sixty-six months follow-up [J].
Caruso, F. ;
Ferrara, M. ;
Castiglione, G. ;
Trombetta, G. ;
De Meo, L. ;
Catanuto, G. ;
Carillio, G. .
EJSO, 2006, 32 (09) :937-940
[9]   Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? [J].
Cense, HA ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Cardozo, ML ;
Van Lanschot, JJB .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 27 (06) :521-526
[10]  
COURTISS EH, 1976, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V58, P1