Cultural evolution, reductionism in the social sciences, and explanatory pluralism

被引:9
作者
Lachapelle, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1177/004839310003000301
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article argues that it is possible to bring the social sciences into evolutionary focus without being committed to a thesis the author calls ontological reductionism, which is a widespread predilection for lower-level explanations. After showing why we should reject ontological reductionism, the author argues that there is a way to construe cultural evolution that does justice to the autonomy of social science explanations. This paves the way for a liberal approach to explanation the author calls explanatory pluralism, which allows for the possibility of explaining cultural phenomena in terms of different evolutionary processes.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 361
页数:31
相关论文
共 41 条
[31]   SUPERVENIENCE OF BIOLOGICAL CONCEPTS [J].
ROSENBERG, A .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1978, 45 (03) :368-386
[32]  
Rosenberg A, 1980, SOCIOBIOLOGY PREEMPT
[33]  
Salmon W. C., 1989, 4 DECADES SCI EXPLAN
[34]  
SOBER E, 1990, ROY INST PH, V27, P73, DOI 10.1017/S1358246100005051
[35]  
Sober Elliott., 1993, Philosophy of Biology
[36]   Explanatory pluralism in evolutionary biology [J].
Sterelny, K .
BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 1996, 11 (02) :193-214
[37]  
Symons D., 1992, ADAPTED MIND EVOLUTI, P137
[38]  
Tooby J., 1992, ADAPTED MIND, P19, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781410608994
[39]  
Wilson E. O., 1999, Consilience-the unity of knowledge
[40]  
Wilson Edward O., 1978, HUM NATURE-INT BIOS