Responses of Amygdala Neurons to Positive Reward-Predicting Stimuli Depend on Background Reward (Contingency) Rather Than Stimulus-Reward Pairing (Contiguity)

被引:37
作者
Bermudez, Maria A. [1 ]
Schultz, Wolfram [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Physiol Dev & Neurosci, Cambridge, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
BASOLATERAL AMYGDALA; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; CONDITIONED INHIBITION; SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT; HIPPOCAMPAL-FORMATION; VISUAL RESPONSES; MONKEY; LESIONS; FEAR; CS;
D O I
10.1152/jn.00933.2009
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Bermudez MA, Schultz W. Responses of amygdala neurons to positive reward-predicting stimuli depend on background reward (contingency) rather than stimulus-reward pairing (contiguity). J Neurophysiol 103: 1158-1170, 2010. First published December 23, 2009; doi:10.1152/jn.00933.2009. Prediction about outcomes constitutes a basic mechanism underlying informed economic decision making. A stimulus constitutes a reward predictor when it provides more information about the reward than the environmental background. Reward prediction can be manipulated in two ways, by varying the reward paired with the stimulus, as done traditionally in neurophysiological studies, and by varying the background reward while holding stimulus-reward pairing constant. Neuronal mechanisms involved in reward prediction should also be sensitive to changes in background reward independently of stimulus-reward pairing. We tested this assumption on a major brain structure involved in reward processing, the central and basolateral amygdala. In a 2 x 2 design, we examined the influence of rewarded and unrewarded backgrounds on neuronal responses to rewarded and unrewarded visual stimuli. Indeed, responses to the unchanged rewarded stimulus depended crucially on background reward in a population of amygdala neurons. Elevating background reward to the level of the rewarded stimulus extinguished these responses, and lowering background reward again reinstated the responses without changes in stimulus-reward pairing. None of these neurons responded specifically to an inhibitory stimulus predicting less reward compared with background (negative contingency). A smaller group of amygdala neurons maintained stimulus responses irrespective of background reward, possibly reflecting stimulus-reward pairing or visual sensory processes without reward prediction. Thus in being sensitive to background reward, the responses of a population of amygdala neurons to phasic stimuli appeared to follow the full criteria for excitatory reward prediction (positive contingency) rather than reflecting simple stimulus-reward pairing (contiguity).
引用
收藏
页码:1158 / 1170
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[11]  
Carelli RM, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P8204
[12]   Effects of expectations for different reward magnitudes on neuronal activity in primate striatum [J].
Cromwell, HC ;
Schultz, W .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 89 (05) :2823-2838
[13]   OUTCOME-SELECTIVE EFFECTS OF INTERTRIAL REINFORCEMENT IN A PAVLOVIAN APPETITIVE CONDITIONING PARADIGM WITH RATS [J].
DELAMATER, AR .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1995, 23 (01) :31-39
[14]   Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts [J].
Dias, R ;
Robbins, TW ;
Roberts, AC .
NATURE, 1996, 380 (6569) :69-72
[15]  
Dickinson A., 1980, CONT ANIMAL LEARNING
[16]   SITUATIONAL CUES AND CORRELATION BETWEEN CS AND US AS DETERMINANTS OF CONDITIONED EMOTIONAL RESPONSE [J].
DWECK, CS ;
WAGNER, AR .
PSYCHONOMIC SCIENCE, 1970, 18 (03) :145-147
[17]   SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT IN RATS AS A FUNCTION OF INFORMATION VALUE AND RELIABILITY OF STIMULUS [J].
EGGER, MD ;
MILLER, NE .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1962, 64 (02) :97-&
[18]  
Everitt BJ, 2003, ANN NY ACAD SCI, V985, P233
[19]   THE BASOLATERAL AMYGDALA VENTRAL STRIATAL SYSTEM AND CONDITIONED PLACE PREFERENCE - FURTHER EVIDENCE OF LIMBIC STRIATAL INTERACTIONS UNDERLYING REWARD-RELATED PROCESSES [J].
EVERITT, BJ ;
MORRIS, KA ;
OBRIEN, A ;
ROBBINS, TW .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1991, 42 (01) :1-18
[20]   LESIONS OF THE CENTRAL NUCLEUS OF THE AMYGDALA BLOCK CONDITIONED EXCITATION, BUT NOT CONDITIONED INHIBITION OF FEAR AS MEASURED WITH THE FEAR-POTENTIATED STARTLE EFFECT [J].
FALLS, WA ;
DAVIS, M .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 109 (03) :379-387