Randomised controlled trial of intravenous antibiotic treatment for cellulitis at home compared with hospital

被引:124
作者
Corwin, P
Toop, L
McGeoch, G
Than, M
Wynn-Thomas, S
Wells, JE
Dawson, R
Abernethy, P
Pithie, A
Chambers, S
Fletcher, L
Richards, D
机构
[1] Christchurch Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Gen Practice, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Pegasus Hlth, Christchurch, New Zealand
[3] Christchurch Hosp, Christchurch, New Zealand
来源
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2005年 / 330卷 / 7483期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.38309.447975.EB
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of treatment with intravenous antibiotics for cellulitis at home and in hospital. Design Prospective randomised controlled trial. Setting Christchurch, New Zealand. Participants 200 patients presenting or referred to the only emergency department in Christchurch who were thought to require intravenous antibiotic treatment for cellulitis and who did not have any contraindications to home care were randomly assigned to receive treatment either at home or in hospital. Main outcome measures Days to no advancement of cellulitis was the, primary outcome measure. Days on intravenous and oral antibiotics, days in hospital or in the home care programme, complications, degree of functioning and pain, and satisfaction with site of care were also recorded. Results The two treatment groups did not differ significantly for the primary outcome of days to no advancement of cellulitis, with a mean of 1.5 days (SD 0.11) for die group receiving treatment at home and 1.49 days (SD 0.10) for. the group receiving treatment in hospital (mean difference 0.01 days, 95% confidence interval -0.3 to 0.28). None of the other outcome measures differed significantly except for patients' satisfaction, which was greater in patients treated at home. Conclusions Treatment of cellulitis requiring intravenous antibiotics can be safely delivered at home. Patients prefer home treatment, but in this study only about one third of patients presenting at hospital for intravenous treatment of cellulitis were considered suitable for home treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 132B
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   A randomised controlled trial of the costs of hospital as compared with hospital in the home for acute medical patients [J].
Board, N ;
Brennan, N ;
Caplan, GA .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 24 (03) :305-311
[2]   DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS [J].
BONE, RC ;
BALK, RA ;
CERRA, FB ;
DELLINGER, RP ;
FEIN, AM ;
KNAUS, WA ;
SCHEIN, RMH ;
SIBBALD, WJ .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) :1644-1655
[3]   Hospital in the home: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Caplan, GA ;
Ward, JA ;
Brennan, NJ ;
Coconis, J ;
Board, N ;
Brown, A .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1999, 170 (04) :156-160
[4]  
Dall L, 2003, INFECT MED, V20, P379
[5]   Evaluation of patients' satisfaction with hospital-at-home care [J].
Dubois, A ;
Santos-Eggimann, B .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2001, 24 (01) :84-98
[6]   Early discharge of infected patients through appropriate antibiotic use [J].
Eron, LJ ;
Passos, S .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (01) :61-65
[7]   HOME INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY - A SAFE AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE TO INPATIENT CARE [J].
GRAYSON, ML ;
SILVERS, J ;
TURNIDGE, J .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1995, 162 (05) :249-253
[8]   Once-daily intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid is equivalent to once-daily intravenous ceftriaxone plus oral placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe cellulitis in adults [J].
Grayson, ML ;
McDonald, M ;
Gibson, K ;
Athan, E ;
Munckhof, WJ ;
Paull, P ;
Chambers, F .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (11) :1440-1448
[9]   Home-based treatment of cellulitis with twice-daily cefazolin [J].
Leder, K ;
Turnidge, JD ;
Grayson, ML .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1998, 169 (10) :519-522
[10]  
*MED OUTC TRUST, 1994, AUSTR NZ STAND SF 36