Delirium scales: A review of current evidence

被引:93
作者
Adamis, Dimitrios [1 ]
Sharma, Naveen [2 ]
Whelan, Paul J. P. [3 ]
Macdonald, Alastair J. D. [4 ]
机构
[1] Res & Acad Inst Athens, Athens 10677, Greece
[2] Univ Hosp Lewisham, Ladywell Unit, S London & Maudsley Fdn NHS Trust, London SE13 6TD, England
[3] Cent & NW London NHS Fdn Trust, London W1W 6UL, England
[4] Inst Psychiat, London SE5 8AP, England
关键词
delirium; scales; measurement; instruments; neuropsychological tests; CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD; ELDERLY MEDICAL INPATIENTS; RATING-SCALE; OLDER PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE DELIRIUM; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; DETECTING DELIRIUM; HOSPITAL PATIENTS; SCREENING SCALE;
D O I
10.1080/13607860903421011
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: Delirium is a common neuropsychiatric condition with many adverse outcomes in elderly populations including death. Despite this, it is often misdiagnosed and mistreated. A number of scales can be used to detect delirium. We review scales that have been used in delirium studies and report their psychometric properties. Method: An extensive MEDLINE database search and subsequent examination of reference lists was conducted to identify the various delirium scales that have been designed, primarily for use in the elderly. Results: Twenty-four scales were identified. Delirium instruments differed according to the classification system they were based on, length of time to administer, the rater and whether they were screening scales or measured symptom severity. The psychometric properties of each scale is reported. Conclusion: A large number of scales exist, but not all are properly evaluated in terms of psychometric properties, and there is not unanimity about which scale is the best. However, a small number of scales may be considered already to be robust and useable: the CAM, the DRS, the MDAS and the NEECHAM.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 555
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]  
Schuurmans MJ, 2002, J AM GERIATR SOC, V50, pS3
[52]   A CRITIQUE OF INSTRUMENTS AND METHODS TO DETECT, DIAGNOSE, AND RATE DELIRIUM [J].
SMITH, MJ ;
BREITBART, WS ;
PLATT, MM .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1995, 10 (01) :35-77
[53]  
Stillman M J, 2000, J Palliat Med, V3, P449, DOI 10.1089/jpm.2000.3.4.449
[54]   Validation of the Delirium Rating Scale-revised-98: Comparison with the Delirium Rating Scale and the Cognitive Test for Delirium [J].
Trzepacz, PT ;
Mittal, D ;
Torres, R ;
Kanary, K ;
Norton, J ;
Jimerson, N .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2001, 13 (02) :229-242
[55]   A SYMPTOM RATING-SCALE FOR DELIRIUM [J].
TRZEPACZ, PT ;
BAKER, RW ;
GREENHOUSE, J .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 1988, 23 (01) :89-97
[56]   The Delirium Rating Scale -: Its use in consultation-liaison research [J].
Trzepacz, PT .
PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1999, 40 (03) :193-204
[57]   A REVIEW OF DELIRIUM ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS [J].
TRZEPACZ, PT .
GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 16 (06) :397-405
[58]  
Vermeersch P E, 1990, Appl Nurs Res, V3, P128, DOI 10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80132-6
[59]  
VERMEERSCH PEH, 1992, KEY ASPECTS ELDER CA, P251
[60]  
Williams M A, 1991, Int Psychogeriatr, V3, P301, DOI 10.1017/S1041610291000741