Hierarchical Flexible Peptide Docking by Conformer Generation and Ensemble Docking of Peptides

被引:61
作者
Zhou, Pei [1 ]
Li, Botong [1 ]
Yan, Yumeng [1 ]
Jin, Bowen [1 ]
Wang, Libang [1 ]
Huang, Sheng-You [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Phys, Inst Biophys, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS; SCORING FUNCTION; BINDING-SITES; MOLECULAR DOCKING; GENETIC ALGORITHM; SEARCH STRATEGIES; WEB SERVER; KNOWLEDGE; PREDICTION; BLIND;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00142
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100705 [微生物与生化药学];
摘要
Given the importance of peptide-mediated protein interactions in cellular processes, protein-peptide docking has received increasing attention. Here, we have developed a Hierarchical flexible Peptide Docking approach through fast generation and ensemble docking of peptide conformations, which is referred to as HPepDock. Tested on the LEADS-PEP benchmark data set of 53 diverse complexes with peptides of 3-12 residues, HPepDock performed significantly better than the 11 docking protocols of five small-molecule docking programs (DOCK, AutoDock, AutoDock Vina, Surflex, and GOLD) in predicting near-native binding conformations. HPepDock was also evaluated on the 19 bound/unbound and 10 unbound/unbound protein-peptide complexes of the Glide SP-PEP benchmark and showed an overall better performance than Glide SP-PEP+MM- GBSA and FlexPepDock in both bound and unbound docking. HPepDock is computationally efficient, and the average running time for docking a peptide is similar to 15 min with the range from about 1 min for short peptides to around 40 min for long peptides.
引用
收藏
页码:1292 / 1302
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
DOCK 6: Impact of New Features and Current Docking Performance [J].
Allen, William J. ;
Balius, Trent E. ;
Mukherjee, Sudipto ;
Brozell, Scott R. ;
Moustakas, Demetri T. ;
Lang, P. Therese ;
Case, David A. ;
Kuntz, Irwin D. ;
Rizzo, Robert C. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 36 (15) :1132-1156
[2]
DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility [J].
Antes, Iris .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 78 (05) :1084-1104
[3]
Audie J, 2012, FUTURE MED CHEM, V4, P1619, DOI [10.4155/FMC.12.99, 10.4155/fmc.12.99]
[4]
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking [J].
Ben-Shimon, Avraham ;
Niv, Masha Y. .
STRUCTURE, 2015, 23 (05) :929-940
[5]
The Protein Data Bank [J].
Berman, HM ;
Westbrook, J ;
Feng, Z ;
Gilliland, G ;
Bhat, TN ;
Weissig, H ;
Shindyalov, IN ;
Bourne, PE .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2000, 28 (01) :235-242
[6]
The Future of Peptide-based Drugs [J].
Craik, David J. ;
Fairlie, David P. ;
Liras, Spiros ;
Price, David .
CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN, 2013, 81 (01) :136-147
[7]
PepCrawler: a fast RRT-based algorithm for high-resolution refinement and binding affinity estimation of peptide inhibitors [J].
Donsky, Elad ;
Wolfson, Haim J. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (20) :2836-2842
[8]
DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases [J].
Ewing, TJA ;
Makino, S ;
Skillman, AG ;
Kuntz, ID .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2001, 15 (05) :411-428
[9]
Peptide therapeutics: current status and future directions [J].
Fosgerau, Keld ;
Hoffmann, Torsten .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2015, 20 (01) :122-128
[10]
Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy [J].
Friesner, RA ;
Banks, JL ;
Murphy, RB ;
Halgren, TA ;
Klicic, JJ ;
Mainz, DT ;
Repasky, MP ;
Knoll, EH ;
Shelley, M ;
Perry, JK ;
Shaw, DE ;
Francis, P ;
Shenkin, PS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 47 (07) :1739-1749