Measures of effect size

被引:68
作者
Richardson, JTE
机构
[1] Brunel University, Uxbridge
[2] Department of Human Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge
来源
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS | 1996年 / 28卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03203631
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Two different approaches have been used to derive measures of effect size. One approach is based on the comparison of treatment means. The standardized mean difference is an appropriate measure of effect size when one is merely comparing two treatments, but there is no satisfactory analogue for comparing more than two treatments. The second approach is based on the proportion of variance in the dependent variable that is explained by the independent variable. Estimates have been proposed for both fixed-factor and random-factor designs, but their sampling properties are not well understood. Nevertheless, measures of effect size can allow quantitative comparisons to be made across different studies, and they can be a useful adjunct to more traditional outcome measures such as test statistics and significance levels.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 22
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   A NONPARAMETRIC TECHNIQUE FOR META-ANALYSIS EFFECT SIZE CALCULATION [J].
KRAEMER, HC ;
ANDREWS, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 91 (02) :404-412
[32]   TESTS OF HOMOGENEITY OF INDEPENDENT CORRELATION-COEFFICIENTS [J].
KRAEMER, HC .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1979, 44 (03) :329-335
[33]  
KRAEMER HC, 1983, J EDUC STATIST, V8, P93
[34]   MISINTERPRETING SIGNIFICANCE OF EXPLAINED VARIATION [J].
LEVIN, JR .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1967, 22 (08) :675-&
[35]  
Lindquist E.F, 1953, DESIGN ANAL EXPT PSY
[36]  
Linn M.C., 1986, PSYCHOL GENDER, P67
[37]  
MCNEMAR Q, 1962, PSYCHOL STATISTICS
[38]  
Norton DW, 1951, REV EDUC RES, V21, P350
[39]   MEASURES OF EXPLAINED VARIANCE - CAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS [J].
OGRADY, KE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1982, 92 (03) :766-777
[40]  
PEARSON K, 1923, BIOMETRIKA, V14, P412, DOI DOI 10.2307/2331822