Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methods in electrical impedance tomography

被引:256
作者
Kaipio, JP
Kolehmainen, V
Somersalo, E
Vauhkonen, M
机构
[1] Univ Kuopio, Dept Appl Phys, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Aalto Univ, Math Inst, FIN-02015 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0266-5611/16/5/321
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
This paper discusses the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) problem: electric currents are injected into a body with unknown electromagnetic properties through a set of contact electrodes. The corresponding voltages that are needed to maintain these currents are measured. The objective is to estimate the unknown resistivity, or more generally the impedivity distribution of the body based on this information. The most commonly used method to tackle this problem in practice is to use gradient-based local linearizations. We give a proof for the differentiability of the electrode boundary data with respect to the resistivity distribution and the contact impedances. Due to the ill-posedness of the problem, regularization has to be employed. In this paper, we consider the EIT problem in the framework of Bayesian statistics, where the inverse problem is recast into a form of statistical inference. The problem is to estimate the posterior distribution of the unknown parameters conditioned on measurement data. From the posterior density, various estimates for the resistivity distribution can be calculated as well as a posteriori uncertainties. The search of the maximum a posteriori estimate is typically an optimization problem, while the conditional expectation is computed by integrating the variable with respect to the posterior probability distribution. In practice, especially when the dimension of the parameter space is large, this integration must be done by Monte Carlo methods such as the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) integration. These methods can also be used for calculation of a posteriori uncertainties for the estimators. In this paper, we concentrate on MCMC integration methods. In particular, we demonstrate by numerical examples the statistical approach when the prior densities are nondifferentiable, such as the prior penalizing the total variation or the L-1 norm of the resistivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1487 / 1522
页数:36
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Electrical impedance tomography: Regularized imaging and contrast detection [J].
Adler, A ;
Guardo, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1996, 15 (02) :170-179
[2]   Stable determination of a crack in a planar inhomogeneous conductor [J].
Alessandrini, G ;
Rondi, L .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, 1998, 30 (02) :326-340
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, P 11 SCAND C IM AN S
[4]   Optical tomography in medical imaging [J].
Arridge, SR .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 1999, 15 (02) :R41-R93
[5]  
Brenner S., 2008, The mathematical theory of finite element methods, V3rd ed., DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0
[6]   APPLIED POTENTIAL TOMOGRAPHY - POSSIBLE CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS [J].
BROWN, BH ;
BARBER, DC ;
SEAGAR, AD .
CLINICAL PHYSICS AND PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1985, 6 (02) :109-121
[7]   Electrical impedance tomography [J].
Cheney, M ;
Isaacson, D ;
Newell, JC .
SIAM REVIEW, 1999, 41 (01) :85-101
[8]  
Cheney M, 1990, Int J Imaging Syst Technol, V2, P66, DOI 10.1002/ima.1850020203
[9]   ELECTRODE MODELS FOR ELECTRIC-CURRENT COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
CHENG, KS ;
ISAACSON, D ;
NEWELL, JC ;
GISSER, DG .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1989, 36 (09) :918-924
[10]   Regularized reconstruction in electrical impedance tomography using a variance uniformization constraint [J].
CohenBacrie, C ;
Goussard, Y ;
Guardo, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (05) :562-571