Femoral Vein Cannulation Performed by Residents: A Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided and Landmark Technique in Infants and Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

被引:68
作者
Aouad, Marie T. [1 ]
Kanazi, Ghassan E. [1 ]
Abdallah, Faraj W. [1 ]
Moukaddem, Farah H. [1 ]
Turbay, Massud J. [1 ]
Obeid, Mounir Y. [1 ]
Siddik-Sayyid, Sahar M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Dept Anesthesiol, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
CENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION; ANATOMIC RELATIONSHIP; CATHETER PLACEMENT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; COMPLICATIONS; ACCESS; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e9c475
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cannulation of the femoral vein, in the pediatric age group, can be technically challenging, especially when performed by residents in training. We examined whether the use of real-time ultrasound guidance is superior to a landmark technique for femoral vein catheterization in children undergoing heart surgery. METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups. In group LM, the femoral vein was cannulated using the traditional method of palpation of arterial pulse. In group US, cannulation was guided by real-time scanning with an ultrasound probe. The time to complete cannulation (primary outcome), success rate, number of needle passes, number of successful cannulations on first needle pass, and incidence of complications were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Forty-eight pediatric patients were studied. The time to complete cannulation was significantly shorter (155 [46-690] vs 370 [45-1620] seconds; P = 0.02) in group US versus group LM. The success rate was similar in both groups (95.8%). The number of needle passes was smaller (1 [1-8] vs 3 [1-21]; P = 0.001) and the number of successful cannulations on first needle pass higher (18 vs 6; P = 0.001) in group US compared with group LM. The incidence of femoral artery puncture was comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral vein, in pediatric patients, when performed by senior anesthesia residents, is superior to the landmark technique in terms of speed and number of needle passes, with remarkable improvement in first attempt success. (Anesth Analg 2010;111:724-8)
引用
收藏
页码:724 / 728
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Ultrasound-guided percutaneous insertion of Hickman lines in children. Prospective study of 500 consecutive procedures [J].
Arul, G. Suren ;
Lewis, Nicola ;
Bromley, Peter ;
Bennett, James .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2009, 44 (07) :1371-1376
[2]   Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in infants and children [J].
Åsheim, P ;
Mostad, U ;
Aadahl, P .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 46 (04) :390-392
[3]   A survey of the use of ultrasound during central venous catheterization [J].
Bailey, Peter L. ;
Glance, Laurent G. ;
Eaton, Michael P. ;
Parshall, Bob ;
McIntosh, Scott .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 104 (03) :491-497
[4]   CENTRAL VENOUS CANNULATION IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS [J].
BURROWS, FA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1993, 71 (03) :463-463
[5]  
Calvert N, 2003, Health Technol Assess, V7, P1
[6]   Uses and complications of central venous catheters inserted in a pediatric emergency department [J].
Chiang, VW ;
Baskin, MN .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2000, 16 (04) :230-232
[7]   Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: The new standard of care? [J].
Feller-Kopman, D .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (08) :1875-1877
[8]  
Finck C, 2002, AM SURGEON, V68, P401
[9]   Pitfalls of ultrasound guided vascular access: the use of three/four-dimensional ultrasound [J].
French, J. L. H. ;
Raine-Fenning, N. J. ;
Hardman, J. G. ;
Bedforth, N. M. .
ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 63 (08) :806-813
[10]   Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit [J].
Froehlich, Curt D. ;
Rigby, Mark R. ;
Rosenberg, Eli S. ;
Li, Ruosha ;
Roerig, Pei-Ling J. ;
Easley, Kirk A. ;
Stockwell, Jana A. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (03) :1090-1096