Effect of periarticular and intraarticular lidocaine injections for sacroiliac joint pain: prospective comparative study

被引:105
作者
Murakami, Eiichi [1 ]
Tanaka, Yasuhisa
Aizawa, Toshimi
Ishizuka, Masato
Kokubun, Shoichi
机构
[1] Kamaishi Municipal Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kamishi, Iwate, Japan
[2] Tohoku Grad Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00776-007-1126-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) can be a source of low back pain. Previous studies indicated that SIJ pain could originate from both the joint capsule and the posterior ligamentous tissues. It has not been clarified as to whether an intraarticular or periarticular injection procedure is more effective for this type of pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two injection procedures prospectively. Methods After a pain provocation test, an intraarticular injection of local anesthetic (2% lidocaine) was performed on the first 25 consecutive patients with SIJ pain and a periarticular injection on another 25. The periarticular injections were given to one or more sections of the posterior periarticular area of the SIJ and to another section in the extracranial portion. The effect of these injections was assessed using the "restriction of activities of daily life" scoring system from the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Results The periarticular injection was effective in all patients, but the intraarticular one was effective in only 9 of 25 patients. An additional periarticular injection was performed in 16 patients who experienced no effect from the initial intraarticular injection and was considered effective in all of them. The injection into the middle of the periarticular area was more effective for SIJ pain. The improvement rate after the periarticular injection was 96%, which was significantly higher than that after the intraarticular injection, which was 62%. Conclusions For patients with SIJ pain, periarticular injection is more effective and easier to perform than the intraarticular injection and should be tried initially.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 280
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
THE AXIAL SACROILIAC JOINT [J].
BAKLAND, O ;
HANSEN, JH .
ANATOMIA CLINICA, 1984, 6 (01) :29-36
[2]
Bechtel R, 2001, Spine J, V1, P255, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00081-X
[3]
MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC ANATOMY OF THE SACROILIAC JOINT FROM EMBRYONIC LIFE UNTIL THE 8TH DECADE [J].
BOWEN, V ;
CASSIDY, JD .
SPINE, 1981, 6 (06) :620-628
[4]
ANATOMY OF BACKACHE [J].
BRADLEY, KC .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1974, 44 (03) :227-232
[5]
Sacroiliac joint pain: A comprehensive review of anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment [J].
Cohen, SP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (05) :1440-1453
[6]
The value of medical history and physical examination in diagnosing sacroiliac joint pain [J].
Dreyfuss, P ;
Michaelsen, M ;
Pauza, K ;
McLarty, J ;
Bogduk, N .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (22) :2594-2602
[7]
Fortin JD, 1999, AM J NEURORADIOL, V20, P1429
[8]
SACROILIAC JOINT - PAIN REFERRAL MAPS UPON APPLYING A NEW INJECTION ARTHROGRAPHY TECHNIQUE .1. ASYMPTOMATIC VOLUNTEERS [J].
FORTIN, JD ;
DWYER, AP ;
WEST, S ;
PIER, J .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (13) :1475-1482
[9]
SACROILIAC JOINT - PAIN REFERRAL MAPS UPON APPLYING A NEW INJECTION ARTHROGRAPHY TECHNIQUE .2. CLINICAL-EVALUATION [J].
FORTIN, JD ;
APRILL, CN ;
PONTHIEUX, B ;
PIER, J .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (13) :1483-1489