Network governance for large-scale natural resource conservation and the challenge of capture

被引:47
作者
Bixler, R. Patrick [1 ]
Wald, Dara M. [2 ]
Ogden, Laura A. [3 ]
Leong, Kirsten M. [4 ]
Johnston, Erik W. [5 ]
Romolini, Michele [6 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Inst Renewable Nat Resources, College Stn, TX USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Greenlee Sch Journalism & Commun, Ames, IA USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Anthropol, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[4] Natl Pk Serv, Nat Resource Stewardship & Sci Biol Resource, Ft Collins, CO USA
[5] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Policy Informat, Phoenix, AZ USA
[6] Loyola Marymount Univ, Ctr Urban Resilience, Los Angeles, CA 90045 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
ENVIRONMENTAL GOVERNANCE; LANDSCAPES; POLITICS; NEOLIBERALISM; MANAGEMENT; SCIENCE; WORLD;
D O I
10.1002/fee.1252
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Large-scale natural resource conservation initiatives are increasingly adopting a network governance framework to respond to the ecological, social, and political challenges of contemporary environmental governance. A network approach offers new modes of management that allow resource managers and others to transcend a single institution, organization, resource, or landscape and engage in conservation that is multi-species and multi-jurisdictional. However, there are challenges to network governance in large-scale conservation efforts, which we address by focusing on how special interests can capture networks and shape the goals, objectives, and outcomes of initiatives. The term network capture is used here to describe an array of strategies that direct the processes and outcomes of large-scale initiatives in ways that advance a group's positions, concerns, or economic interests. We outline how new stakeholders emerge from these management processes, and how the ease of information sharing can blur stakeholder positions and lead to competing knowledge claims. We conclude by reasserting the benefits of network governance while acknowledging the unique challenges that networks present.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 171
页数:7
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Representation of Ecological Systems within the Protected Areas Network of the Continental United States [J].
Aycrigg, Jocelyn L. ;
Davidson, Anne ;
Svancara, Leona K. ;
Gergely, Kevin J. ;
McKerrow, Alexa ;
Scott, J. Michael .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01)
[2]  
Banner JL., 2010, TEX WATER J, V1, P1, DOI DOI 10.21423/TWJ.V1I1.1043
[3]  
Belsky JM, 1999, RURAL SOCIOL, V64, P641, DOI 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00382.x
[4]   Networks and landscapes: a framework for setting goals and evaluating performance at the large landscape scale [J].
Bixler, R. Patrick ;
Johnson, Shawn ;
Emerson, Kirk ;
Nabatchi, Tina ;
Reuling, Melly ;
Curtin, Charles ;
Romolini, Michele ;
Grove, J. Morgan .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 14 (03) :145-153
[5]   Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference [J].
Bombaci, Sara P. ;
Farr, Cooper M. ;
Gallo, H. Travis ;
Mangan, Anna M. ;
Stinson, Lani T. ;
Kaushik, Monica ;
Pejchar, Liba .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 30 (01) :216-225
[6]  
Briggs Sue, 2003, Ecological Management & Restoration, V4, P161, DOI 10.1046/j.1442-8903.2003.00151.x
[7]   Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority [J].
Cashore, B .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2002, 15 (04) :503-529
[8]  
Cashore Benjamin., 2004, GOVERNING MARKETS FO
[9]   Neoliberalism and the Biophysical Environment A Synthesis and Evaluation of the Research [J].
Castree, Noel .
ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIETY-ADVANCES IN RESEARCH, 2010, 1 (01) :5-45
[10]  
Cattelino J, UNSETTLING NATURE EV