Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing

被引:168
作者
Goffaux, V
Gauthier, I
Rossion, B
机构
[1] Univ Catholique Louvain, Unite Neurosci Cognit, NESC, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Univ Catholique Louvain, Neurophysiol Lab, NEFY, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[4] Brown Univ, Dept Cognit & Linguist Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2003年 / 16卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
face processing; specificity; N170; configuration; spatial scales;
D O I
10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00056-9
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Event-related potential (ERP) studies have highlighted an occipito-temporal potential, the N170, which is larger for faces than for other categories and delayed by stimulus inversion of faces, but not of other objects. We examined how high-pass and low-pass filtering modulate such early differences between the processing of faces and objects. Sixteen grey-scale pictures of faces and cars were filtered to preserve only relatively low (LSF) or high (HSF) spatial frequencies and were presented upright or upside-down. Subjects reported the orientation of the faces and cars in broad-pass and filtered conditions. In the broad-pass condition, we replicated typical N170 face-specific effects of amplitude and delay with inversion. These effects were also present in the LSF condition. However, a completely different pattern was revealed by the HSF condition: (1) a similar N170 amplitude for cars as compared to faces and (2) an absence of N170 latency delay with face inversion. These results show that the source of early processing differences between faces and objects is related to the extraction of information contained mostly in the LSF, which conveys coarse configuration cues particularly salient for face processing. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 424
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ASPECTS FACE PROCESS
[2]   Structural encoding and identification in face processing: ERP evidence for separate mechanisms [J].
Bentin, S ;
Deouell, LY .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 17 (1-3) :35-54
[3]   Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans [J].
Bentin, S ;
Allison, T ;
Puce, A ;
Perez, E ;
McCarthy, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) :551-565
[4]   Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia [J].
Bentin, S ;
Deouell, LY ;
Soroker, N .
NEUROREPORT, 1999, 10 (04) :823-827
[5]  
BIEDERMAN I, 1988, PHILOS T R SOC LON B, V29, P121
[6]   SCALP TOPOGRAPHY AND ANALYSIS OF INTRACRANIAL SOURCES OF FACE-EVOKED POTENTIALS [J].
BOTZEL, K ;
SCHULZE, S ;
STODIECK, SRG .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 104 (01) :135-143
[7]   Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces [J].
Carmel, D ;
Bentin, S .
COGNITION, 2002, 83 (01) :1-29
[8]   Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity [J].
Collishaw, SM ;
Hole, GJ .
PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (08) :893-909
[9]   Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces? [J].
Collishaw, SM ;
Hole, GJ .
PERCEPTION, 2002, 31 (03) :287-296
[10]   WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE [J].
DIAMOND, R ;
CAREY, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) :107-117