Intention and stochastic outcomes: An experimental study

被引:74
作者
Charness, Gary [1 ]
Levine, David I.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02066.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Do people care about intentions - even when good intentions do not produce good results? In our experiments we find that rates of punishment and reward react strongly to intentions (the wage a firm decides to pay) and more modestly to distributional outcomes (the higher or lower wage actually received including the stochastic component). For example, workers who end up receiving medium wages respond much more positively when this resulted from the firm offering a high wage but bad luck lowered the worker's pay than when this resulted from the firm offering a low wage and good luck raised the pay.
引用
收藏
页码:1051 / 1072
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Bewley TF, 1999, Why Wages Don't Fall during a Recession
[3]   WHEN SOCIAL OUTCOMES ARENT FAIR - THE EFFECT OF CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS ON PREFERENCES [J].
BLOUNT, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 63 (02) :131-144
[4]   ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition [J].
Bolton, GE ;
Ockenfels, A .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (01) :166-193
[5]   Truth or consequences: An experiment [J].
Brandts, J ;
Charness, G .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (01) :116-130
[6]  
Brandts J, 2000, EXP ECON, V2, P227
[7]  
BROCKNER J, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P397, DOI 10.5465/256835
[8]   EFFECT OF OUTCOME ON PHYSICIAN JUDGMENTS OF APPROPRIATENESS OF CARE [J].
CAPLAN, RA ;
POSNER, KL ;
CHENEY, FW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 265 (15) :1957-1960
[9]   A laboratory study of group polarisation in the team dictator game [J].
Cason, TN ;
Mui, VL .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1997, 107 (444) :1465-1483
[10]   Expressed preferences and behavior in experimental games [J].
Charness, G ;
Rabin, M .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2005, 53 (02) :151-169