Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data

被引:5668
作者
Maris, Eric
Oostenveld, Robert
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Inst Cognit & Informat NICI, NL-6500 HE Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, FC Donders Ctr Cognit Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
nonparametric statistical testing; hypothesis testing; EEG; MEG; multiple comparisons problem;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this paper, we show how ElectroEncephaloGraphic (EEG) and MagnetoEncephaloGraphic (MEG) data can be analyzed statistically using nonparametric techniques. Nonparametric statistical tests offer complete freedom to the user with respect to the test statistic by means of which the experimental conditions are compared. This freedom provides a straightforward way to solve the multiple comparisons problem (MCP) and it allows to incorporate biophysically motivated constraints in the test statistic, which may drastically increase the sensitivity of the statistical test. The paper is written for two audiences: (1) empirical neuroscientists looking for the most appropriate data analysis method, and (2) methodologists interested in the theoretical concepts behind nonparametric statistical tests. For the empirical neuroscientist, a large part of the paper is written in a tutorial-like fashion, enabling neuroscientists to construct their own statistical test, maximizing the sensitivity to the expected effect. And for the methodologist, it is explained why the nonparametric test is formally correct. This means that we formulate a null hypothesis (identical probability distribution in the different experimental conditions) and show that the nonparametric test controls the false alarm rate under this null hypothesis. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 190
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Statistical detection of between-group differences in event-related potentials [J].
Achim, A .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (06) :1023-1034
[2]   AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD FOR SIGNIFICANCE TESTING OF WAVE-FORM DIFFERENCE POTENTIALS [J].
BLAIR, RC ;
KARNISKI, W .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 30 (05) :518-524
[3]   Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis [J].
Bullmore, E ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, SCR ;
Rabehesketh, S ;
Janot, N ;
David, A ;
Mellers, J ;
Howard, R ;
Sham, P .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 35 (02) :261-277
[4]   Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Suckling, J ;
Overmeyer, S ;
Rabe-Hesketh, S ;
Taylor, E ;
Brammer, MJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (01) :32-42
[5]   Improving permutation test power for group analysis of spatially filtered MEG data [J].
Chau, W ;
McIntosh, AR ;
Robinson, SE ;
Schulz, M ;
Pantev, C .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 23 (03) :983-996
[6]   Permutation methods: A basis for exact inference [J].
Ernst, MD .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 19 (04) :676-685
[7]   Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of inference and power [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Holmes, A ;
Poline, JB ;
Price, CJ ;
Frith, CD .
NEUROIMAGE, 1996, 4 (03) :223-235
[8]   Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests [J].
Galan, L ;
Biscay, R ;
Rodriguez, JL ;
PerezAbalo, MC ;
Rodriguez, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 102 (03) :240-247
[9]   SIGNIFICANCE TESTING OF DIFFERENCE POTENTIALS [J].
GUTHRIE, D ;
BUCHWALD, JS .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 28 (02) :240-244
[10]   N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences [J].
Halgren, E ;
Dhond, RP ;
Christensen, N ;
Van Petten, C ;
Marinkovic, K ;
Lewine, JD ;
Dale, AM .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 17 (03) :1101-1116