Low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations

被引:409
作者
Kennedy, CA [1 ]
Carpenter, MH
Lewis, RM
机构
[1] Sandia Natl Labs, Combust Res Facil, Livermore, CA 94551 USA
[2] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Computat Methods & Simulat Branch, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[3] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Inst Comp Applicat Sci & Engn, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0168-9274(99)00141-5
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The derivation of low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta (ERK) schemes has been performed in the context of integrating the compressible Navier-Stokes equations via direct numerical simulation. Optimization of ERK methods is done across the broad range of properties, such as stability and accuracy efficiency, linear and nonlinear stability, error control reliability, step change stability, and dissipation/dispersion accuracy, subject to varying degrees of memory economization. Following van der Houwen and Wray, sixteen ERK pairs are presented using from two to five registers of memory per equation, per grid point and having accuracies from third- to fifth-order. Methods have been tested with not only DETEST, but also with the 1D wave equation. Two of the methods have been applied to the DNS of a compressible jet as well as methane-air and hydrogen-air flames. Derived 3(2) End 4(3) pairs are competitive with existing full-storage methods. Although a substantial efficiency penalty accompanies use of two- and three-register, fifth-order methods, the best contemporary full-storage methods can be nearly matched while still saving 2-3 registers of memory. (C) 2000 IMACS. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 219
页数:43
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]   On the removal of boundary errors caused by Runge-Kutta integration of nonlinear partial differential equations [J].
Abarbanel, S ;
Gottlieb, D ;
Carpenter, MH .
SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 1996, 17 (03) :777-782
[2]   Explicit single step methods with optimal order of convergence for partial differential equations [J].
Alonso-Mallo, I .
APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 1999, 31 (02) :117-131
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, TM109112 NASA LANGL
[4]   Does error control suppress spuriosity? [J].
Aves, MA ;
Griffiths, DF ;
Higham, DJ .
SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 1997, 34 (02) :756-778
[5]   Continuous approximation with embedded Runge-Kutta methods [J].
Baker, TS ;
Dormand, JR ;
Gilmore, JP ;
Prince, PJ .
APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 1996, 22 (1-3) :51-62
[6]   COMPRESSIBILITY EFFECTS ON THE GROWTH AND STRUCTURE OF HOMOGENEOUS TURBULENT SHEAR-FLOW [J].
BLAISDELL, GA ;
MANSOUR, NN ;
REYNOLDS, WC .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1993, 256 :443-485
[7]   An efficient Runge-Kutta (4,5) pair [J].
Bogacki, P ;
Shampine, LF .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1996, 32 (06) :15-28
[8]  
Bogacki P, 1989, APPL MATH LETT, V2, P321
[9]  
Butcher J.C., 1964, J. Aust. Math. Soc, V4, P179, DOI [10.1017/S1446788700023387, DOI 10.1017/S1446788700023387]
[10]  
Butcher J. C., 1987, The Numerical Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations: Runge-Kutta and General Linear Methods