An exploratory study of information technology evaluation and benefits management practices of SMEs

被引:126
作者
Love, PED [1 ]
Irani, Z
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Management Informat Syst, We B Ctr, Perth, WA 6027, Australia
[2] Brunel Univ, Dept Informat Syst & Comp, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australia; construction; IT benefits and costs; evaluation; SMEs;
D O I
10.1016/j.im.2003.12.011
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
While the number of articles on IT evaluation and benefits management has been substantial, limited attention has been given to these topics in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), particularly the construction industry. This paper presents findings from a questionnaire survey that sought to examine the approaches used by 126 construction organisations to evaluate and justify their IT investments, as well as the benefits and costs that they have experienced due to IT implementation. The analysis of their responses identified three key findings. Firstly, different organisation types significantly differ in the amount they invest in IT and their firm size (in terms of turnover and number of employees) does not influence investment levels in IT. Secondly, the evaluation process adopted by construction SMEs is used as for both control and learning. Thirdly, a major barrier to justifying IT investments was attributed to having no strategic vision. While organisations experienced no significant differences in the tactical and operational benefits incurred after the adoption of IT, differences were found with respect to the strategic benefits. If construction SMEs are to leverage the benefits of IT, then this should form an integral part of their business strategy. Considering this, recommendations for IT evaluation for construction SMEs that are also pertinent for SMEs operating in other industry sectors, are presented. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 242
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]  
Flanagan R., 2000, Eng. Construct. Architect. Manag., V7, P423, DOI DOI 10.1108/EB021164
[22]  
GRAESER V, 1998, DEV IT SCORECARD STU
[23]  
GRINDLEY K, 1995, MANAGING IT BOARD LE
[24]   STRATEGIC INFORMATION-SYSTEMS AND COMPETITIVENESS - ARE FIRMS READY FOR AN IST-DRIVEN COMPETITIVE CHALLENGE [J].
HAGMANN, C ;
MCCAHON, CS .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 1993, 25 (04) :183-192
[25]   Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value [J].
Hitt, LM ;
Brynjolfsson, E .
MIS QUARTERLY, 1996, 20 (02) :121-142
[26]  
Hochstrasser B., 1992, P ADV INF SYST C NEW, P17
[27]  
HOCHSTRASSER B, 1991, CONTROLLING IT INVES
[28]  
HOGBIN G, 1994, MCGRAWHILL IBM SERIE
[29]   Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain [J].
Irani, Z .
INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT, 2002, 40 (01) :11-24
[30]   Transforming failure into success through organisational learning: an analysis of a manufacturing information system [J].
Irani, Z ;
Sharif, AM ;
Love, PED .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 10 (01) :55-66