Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial

被引:79
作者
Balkany, Thomas
Hodges, Annelle
Menapace, Christine
Hazard, Linda
Driscoll, Colin
Gantz, Bruce
Kelsall, David
Luxford, William
McMenomy, Sean
Neely, J. Gail
Peters, Brian
Pillsbury, Harold
Roberson, Joseph
Schramm, David
Telian, Steven
Waltzman, Susan
Westerberg, Brian
Payne, Stacy
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Ear Inst, Dept Otol & Laryngol, Miami, FL 33101 USA
[2] Cochler Amer, Denver, CO USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[5] Rocky Mtn Ear Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[6] House Ear Clin, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR USA
[8] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[9] Dallas Otolaryngol Assoc, Dallas, TX USA
[10] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[11] Calif Ear Inst Palo Alto, Palo Alto, CA USA
[12] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[13] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[14] NYU, New York, NY 10012 USA
[15] St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.otohns.2007.01.006
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate hearing outcomes and effects of stimulation rate on performance with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant (Cochlear Americas, Denver, CO). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, controlled, prospective, single-blind clinical study using single-subject repeated measures (A-B-A-B) design at 14 academic centers in the United States and Canada and comparison with outcomes of a prior device by the same manufacturer. PATIENTS: Seventy-one severely/profoundly hearing impaired adults. RESULTS: Seventy-one adult recipients were randomly programmed in two different sets of rate: ACE or higher rate ACE RE. Mean scores for Consonant Nucleus Consonant words is 57%, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) sentences in quiet 78%, and HINT sentences in noise 64%. Sixty-seven percent of subjects preferred slower rates of stimulation, and performance did not improve with higher rates of stimulation using this device. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects performed well, and there was no advantage to higher stimulation rates with this device. SIGNIFICANCE: Higher stimulation rates do not necessarily result in improved performance. (C) 2007 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 762
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Cochlear implants in children - A review [J].
Balkany, TJ ;
Hodges, AV ;
Eshraghi, AA ;
Butts, S ;
Bricker, K ;
Lingvai, J ;
Polak, M ;
King, J .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2002, 122 (04) :356-362
[2]   MATHEMATICAL TREATMENT OF CONTEXT EFFECTS IN PHONEME AND WORD RECOGNITION [J].
BOOTHROYD, A ;
NITTROUER, S .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1988, 84 (01) :101-114
[3]   Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants [J].
Friesen, LM ;
Shannon, RV ;
Cruz, RJ .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2005, 10 (03) :169-184
[4]   Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users [J].
Galvin, JJ ;
Fu, QJ .
JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 6 (03) :269-279
[5]   Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception [J].
Nie, K ;
Barco, A ;
Zeng, FG .
EAR AND HEARING, 2006, 27 (02) :208-217
[6]   DEVELOPMENT OF THE HEARING IN NOISE TEST FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLDS IN QUIET AND IN NOISE [J].
NILSSON, M ;
SOLI, SD ;
SULLIVAN, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 95 (02) :1085-1099
[7]   The Nucleus® 24 Contour™ cochlear implant system:: Adult clinical trial results [J].
Parkinson, AJ ;
Arcaroli, J ;
Staller, SJ ;
Arndt, PL ;
Cosgriff, A ;
Ebinger, K .
EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (01) :41S-48S
[8]   REVISED CNC LISTS FOR AUDITORY TESTS [J].
PETERSON, GE ;
LEHISTE, I .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1962, 27 (01) :62-70