Mitigating Supply Risk: Dual Sourcing or Process Improvement?

被引:256
作者
Wang, Yimin [1 ]
Gilland, Wendell [2 ]
Tomlin, Brian [3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll, Tuck Sch Business, Hanover, NH 03775 USA
关键词
operations strategy; risk management; supply chain management; PROCESS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; DYNAMIC PROCESS IMPROVEMENT; INVENTORY MODELS; YIELD RANDOMNESS; DIVERSIFICATION; UNCERTAINTY; CAPACITY; DEMAND; CHAINS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1287/msom.1090.0279
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Surveys suggest that supply chain risk is a growing issue for executives and that supplier reliability is of particular concern. A common mitigation strategy is for the buying firm to expend effort improving the reliability of its supply base. We explore a model in which a firm can source from multiple suppliers and/or exert effort to improve supplier reliability. For both random capacity and random yield types of supply uncertainty, we propose a model of process improvement in which improvement efforts (if successful) increase supplier reliability in the sense that the delivered quantity (for any given order quantity) is stochastically larger after improvement. We characterize the optimal procurement quantities and improvement efforts and generate managerial insights. For random capacity, improvement is increasingly favored over dual sourcing as the supplier cost heterogeneity increases, but dual sourcing is favored over improvement if the supplier reliability heterogeneity is high. In the random yield model, increasing cost heterogeneity can reduce the attractiveness of improvement, and improvement can be favored over dual sourcing if the reliability heterogeneity is high. A combined strategy (improvement and dual sourcing) can provide significant value if suppliers are very unreliable and/or capacity is low relative to demand.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 510
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Supplier diversification: effect of discrete demand [J].
Swaminathan, JM ;
Shanthikumar, JG .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 1999, 24 (05) :213-221
[42]  
SWINNEY R, 2008, MANUFACTURING SERVIC, V11, P109
[43]   Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up [J].
Terwiesch, C ;
Bohn, RE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2001, 70 (01) :1-19
[44]  
Tomlin B., 2005, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V7, P37, DOI 10.1287/msom.1040.0063
[45]   On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risks [J].
Tomlin, Brian .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (05) :639-657
[46]  
WEIL N, 2004, COMPUT WORLD OP 0512
[47]  
Wouters Marc, 2007, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V13, P228, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2007.07.002
[48]  
YU S, 2004, DIGITIMES 0213
[49]   Toward a theory of continuous improvement and the learning curve [J].
Zangwill, WI ;
Kantor, PB .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (07) :910-920
[50]   Pushing quality improvement along supply chains [J].
Zhu, Kaijie ;
Zhang, Rachel Q. ;
Tsung, Fugee .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (03) :421-436