Analyses of the results of different test systems in the 2005 global proficiency testing schemes for infectious bursal disease virus and Newcastle disease virus antibody detection in chicken serum

被引:13
作者
de Wit, J. J. [1 ]
van de Sande, H. W. A. [1 ]
Counotte, G. H. M. [1 ]
Wellenberg, G. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] GD, Anim Hlth Serv Ltd, NL-7400 AA Deventer, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03079450601105676
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The results of global proficiency testing schemes (PTS) for serological tests to detect antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) in chicken serum, in which 125 and 120 laboratories, respectively, participated from Africa, Asia, Europe, Central and South America, were used to analyse the performances of different antibody test systems such as virus neutralization tests, haemagglutination inhibition tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and agar gel precipitation tests. All laboratories were asked to carry out their routine diagnostic tests for the detection of IBDV and NDV antibodies as usual. This global ring trial provided a large amount of data on variation within and between laboratories and test systems used worldwide. The data showed that the variation between the quantitative test results of different laboratories (R-between) using the IBDV virus neutralization tests and the NDV haemagglutination inhibition test was higher (about double) compared with the variation within commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay systems. Although both tests are often referred to and used as the '' gold standard '' in experimental and scientific studies, official procedures and for the validation of tests, this study shows that there is an urgent need for a global implementation of recommended test procedures and/or the inclusion of international reference sera in these studies.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 183
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Alexander DJ, 2003, DIS POULTRY, P63
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 17025 ISOIEC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results - Part 1: General principies and defmitions
[4]  
CLAASSEN I, 2004, FARMEUROPEA BIO, V1, P1
[5]  
de Wit JJ, 1998, TIJDSCHR DIERGENEESK, V123, P7
[6]   Validation of five commercially available ELISAs for the detection of antibodies against infectious bursal disease virus (serotype 1) [J].
de Wit, JJ ;
Heijmans, JF ;
Mekkes, DR ;
van Loon, AAWM .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 30 (05) :543-549
[7]   COMPARISON OF THE ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY, THE HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION TEST AND THE AGAR-GEL PRECIPITATION TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES AGAINST INFECTIOUS-BRONCHITIS AND NEWCASTLE-DISEASE IN COMMERCIAL BROILERS [J].
DEWIT, JJ ;
DAVELAAR, FG ;
BRAUNIUS, WW .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 21 (04) :651-658
[8]  
Lukert P. D., 2003, DIS POULTRY, P161
[9]   Correlation of haemagglutinin-neuraminidase and fusion protein content with protective antibody response after immunisation with inactivated Newcastle disease vaccines [J].
Maas, RA ;
Komen, M ;
van Diepen, M ;
Oei, HL ;
Claassen, IJTM .
VACCINE, 2003, 21 (23) :3137-3142
[10]   Efficacy of inactivated infectious bursal disease (IBD) vaccines: comparison of serology with protection of progeny chickens against IBD virus strains of varying virulence [J].
Maas, RA ;
Venema, S ;
Oei, HL ;
Pol, JMA ;
Claassen, IJTM ;
ter Huurne, AHM .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 30 (04) :345-354