The Direct and Indirect Effects of Advertising Spending on Firm Value

被引:285
作者
Joshi, Amit [1 ]
Hanssens, Dominique M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Mkt, Coll Business Adm, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch Management, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
advertising; stock market valuation; marketing-finance interface; stock return modeling; optimal advertising spending; competitive response; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; STOCK-MARKET VALUATION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; CAPITAL-MARKETS; BRAND ATTITUDE; RETURNS; IMPACT; EXPENDITURES; INNOVATIONS; PROMOTIONS;
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.74.1.20
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Marketing decision makers are increasingly aware of the importance of shareholder value maximization, which calls for an evaluation of the long-term effects of their actions on product-market response and investor response. However, the marketing literature to date has focused on the sales or profit response of marketing actions, and the goals of marketing have traditionally been formulated from a customer perspective. Recently, there have been a few studies of the long-term investor response to marketing actions. The current research investigates one important aspect of this impact, the long-term relationship between advertising spending and market capitalization. The authors hypothesize that advertising can have a direct effect on valuation (i.e., an effect beyond its indirect effect through sales revenue and profit response). The empirical results across two industries provide support for the hypothesis that advertising spending has a positive, long-term impact on own firms' market capitalization and may have a negative impact on the valuation of a competitor of comparable size. The authors quantify the magnitude of this investor response effect for and discuss its implications for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 33
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Aaker D.A., 2009, MANAGING BRAND EQUIT
[2]   THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION-CONTENT OF PERCEIVED QUALITY [J].
AAKER, DA ;
JACOBSON, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1994, 31 (02) :191-201
[3]   The value relevance of brand attitude in high-technology markets [J].
Aaker, DA ;
Jacobson, R .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2001, 38 (04) :485-493
[4]   Revenue premium as an outcome measure of brand equity [J].
Ailawadi, KL ;
Lehmann, DR ;
Neslin, SA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2003, 67 (04) :1-17
[5]   Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics [J].
Barber, BM ;
Lyon, JD .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 43 (03) :341-372
[6]  
BARTIMO J, 1991, WALL STREET J 0514, P6
[7]   POOLING ISSUES AND METHODS IN REGRESSION-ANALYSIS WITH EXAMPLES IN MARKETING-RESEARCH [J].
BASS, FM ;
WITTINK, DR .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (04) :414-425
[8]   The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures [J].
Chan, LKC ;
Lakonishok, J ;
Sougiannis, T .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (06) :2431-2456
[9]   THE IMPACT OF NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTIONS ON THE MARKET VALUE OF FIRMS [J].
CHANEY, PK ;
DEVINNEY, TM ;
WINER, RS .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1991, 64 (04) :573-610
[10]   ADVERTISING, RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT EXPENDITURES AND THE MARKET VALUE OF THE FIRM [J].
CHAUVIN, KW ;
HIRSCHEY, M .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 1993, 22 (04) :128-140