Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries?

被引:584
作者
Giroud, Xavier [1 ]
Mueller, Holger M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London EC1V 0DG, England
[4] European Corp Governance Inst, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Corporate governance; Product market competition; Anti-takeover legislation; EARNINGS MANAGEMENT; STOCK; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2009.10.008
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
By reducing the threat of a hostile takeover, business combination (BC) laws weaken corporate governance and increase the opportunity for managerial slack. Consistent with the notion that competition mitigates managerial slack, we find that while firms in non-competitive industries experience a significant drop in operating performance after the laws' passage, firms in competitive industries experience no significant effect. When we examine which agency problem competition mitigates, we find evidence in support of a "quiet-life" hypothesis. Input costs, wages, and overhead costs all increase after the laws' passage, and only so in non-competitive industries. Similarly, when we conduct event studies around the dates of the first newspaper reports about the BC laws, we find that while firms in non-competitive industries experience a significant stock price decline, firms in competitive industries experience a small and insignificant stock price impact. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 331
页数:20
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Executive compensation, strategic competition, and relative performance evaluation: Theory and evidence [J].
Aggarwal, RK ;
Samwick, AA .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1999, 54 (06) :1999-2043
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, 9387 NBER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NBER Working Paper No. 5515
[4]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[5]   Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (05) :1043-1075
[6]   Is there discretion in wage setting? a test using takeover legislation [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1999, 30 (03) :535-U2
[7]   Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries [J].
Bloom, Nicholas ;
Van Reenen, John .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2007, 122 (04) :1351-1408
[8]  
CARLTON D, 1989, MODERN IND ORG
[9]   Identifying control motives in managerial ownership: Evidence from antitakeover legislation [J].
Cheng, SJ ;
Nagar, V ;
Rajan, MV .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2005, 18 (02) :637-672
[10]   POISON OR PLACEBO - EVIDENCE ON THE DETERRENCE AND WEALTH EFFECTS OF MODERN ANTITAKEOVER MEASURES [J].
COMMENT, R ;
SCHWERT, GW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 39 (01) :3-43