Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information

被引:494
作者
Pluim, JPW [1 ]
Maintz, JBA [1 ]
Viergever, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Image Sci Inst, NL-3584 CX Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
image gradients; image registration; image structure; multimodal images; mutual information;
D O I
10.1109/42.876307
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 [计算机应用技术]; 0835 [软件工程];
摘要
Mutual information has developed into an accurate measure for rigid and affine monomodality and multimodality image registration. The robustness of the measure is questionable, however A possible reason for this is the absence of spatial information in the measure. The present paper proposes to include spatial information by combining mutual information with a term based on the image gradient of the images to be registered. The gradient term not only seeks to align locations of high gradient magnitude, but also aims for a similar orientation of the gradients at these locations. Results of combining both standard mutual information as well as a normalized measure are presented for rigid registration of three-dimensional clinical images [magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET)]. The results indicate that the combined measures yield a better registration function does mutual information or normalized mutual information per se. The registration functions are less sensitive to low sampling resolution, do not contain incorrect global maxima that are sometimes found in the mutual information function, and interpolation-induced local minima can be reduced. These characteristics yield the promise of more robust registration measures. The accuracy of the combined measures is similar to that of mutual information-based methods.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 814
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information [J].
Maes, F ;
Collignon, A ;
Vandermeulen, D ;
Marchal, G ;
Suetens, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (02) :187-198
[2]
Maintz J B, 1998, Med Image Anal, V2, P1, DOI 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)80026-8
[3]
Maintz J B, 1996, Med Image Anal, V1, P151, DOI 10.1016/S1361-8415(96)80010-7
[4]
Meyer C R, 1997, Med Image Anal, V1, P195, DOI 10.1016/S1361-8415(97)85010-4
[5]
A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2-D-3-D medical image registration [J].
Penney, GP ;
Weese, J ;
Little, JA ;
Desmedt, P ;
Hill, DLG ;
Hawkes, DJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1998, 17 (04) :586-595
[6]
Interpolation artefacts in mutual information-based image registration [J].
Pluim, JPW ;
Maintz, JBA ;
Viergever, MA .
COMPUTER VISION AND IMAGE UNDERSTANDING, 2000, 77 (02) :211-232
[7]
RODRIGUEZCARRAN.CE, 1998, MED IMAGING IMAGE PR
[8]
RUECKERT D, 2000, MED IMAGING IMAGE PR
[9]
An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment [J].
Studholme, C ;
Hill, DLG ;
Hawkes, DJ .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 1999, 32 (01) :71-86
[10]
Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures [J].
Studholme, C ;
Hill, DLG ;
Hawkes, DJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (01) :25-35