Comparative identification of prostanoid inducible proteins by LC-ESI-MS/MS and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry

被引:21
作者
Person, MD [1 ]
Lo, HH [1 ]
Towndrow, KM [1 ]
Jia, Z [1 ]
Monks, TJ [1 ]
Lau, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Coll Pharm, Ctr Mol & Cellular Toxicol, Div Pharmacol & Toxicol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/tx020049d
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Protein identification by MS is well-established. Mixtures of proteins from cell extracts are separated by either one- or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and specific bands or spots are subjected to in-gel digestion and subsequent analysis by MS. The two most common types of ionization used in MS are electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization (MALDI). When ESI is used, the sample is typically analyzed by inline HPLC-ESI-MS/MS with fragmentation of individual digest peptides, followed by database comparison between theoretical and experimental fragmentation patterns. MALDI-MS analysis is based on peptide mass mapping, with mass measurements of the digest peptides searched against a database of theoretical digests. We give here the results of a comparison between ESI-ion trap and MALDI-TOF (time-of-flight) analysis of 11-deoxy,16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E-2 (DDM-PGE(2)) inducible proteins. Individual peptides identified by the two techniques differed, in general, but the resulting protein identification was the same. Slightly higher coverage of each protein was obtained by MALDI-TOF, but the MS/MS data were more definitive by requiring fewer peptides to assign a positive identification. Both methods effectively identified two proteins in the same gel band. The samples here are derived from a renal epithelial cell line (LLC-PK1) established from the New Hampshire minipig, a species poorly represented in the poorly represented in the current database, and strategies and limitations for analyzing such species are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 767
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Proteomics: applications in basic and applied biology [J].
Anderson, NL ;
Matheson, AD ;
Steiner, S .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 11 (04) :408-412
[2]   A multidimensional electrospray MS-based approach to phosphopeptide mapping [J].
Annan, RS ;
Huddleston, MJ ;
Verma, R ;
Deshaies, RJ ;
Carr, SA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 73 (03) :393-404
[3]   Proteomics: new perspectives, new biomedical opportunities [J].
Banks, RE ;
Dunn, MJ ;
Hochstrasser, DF ;
Sanchez, JC ;
Blackstock, W ;
Pappin, DJ ;
Selby, PJ .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9243) :1749-1756
[4]   NOMENCLATURE FOR PEPTIDE FRAGMENT IONS (POSITIVE-IONS) [J].
BIEMANN, K .
METHODS IN ENZYMOLOGY, 1990, 193 :886-887
[5]  
Chambers G, 2000, J PATHOL, V192, P280, DOI 10.1002/1096-9896(200011)192:3<280::AID-PATH748>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-L
[7]   Role of accurate mass measurement (±10 ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS MS and database searching [J].
Clauser, KR ;
Baker, P ;
Burlingame, AL .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 71 (14) :2871-2882
[8]   Direct database searching with MALDI-PSD spectra of peptides [J].
Griffin, PR ;
MacCoss, MJ ;
Eng, JK ;
Blevins, RA ;
Aaronson, JS ;
Yates, JR .
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 1995, 9 (15) :1546-1551
[9]   Identification of proteins from Escherichia coli using two-dimensional semi-preparative electrophoresis and mass spectrometry [J].
Gustafsson, E ;
Thorén, K ;
Larsson, T ;
Davidsson, P ;
Karlsson, KA ;
Nilsson, CL .
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2001, 15 (06) :428-432
[10]   SALSA: A pattern recognition algorithm to detect electrophile-adducted peptides by automated evaluation of CID spectra in LC-MS-MS analyses [J].
Hansen, BT ;
Jones, JA ;
Mason, DE ;
Liebler, DC .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 73 (08) :1676-1683