Clinical application and diagnostic yield of wireless capsule endoscopy in children

被引:36
作者
Antao, Brice
Bishop, Jonathan
Shawis, Rang
Thomson, Mike
机构
[1] Sheffield Childrens Hosp, Pediat Surg Unit, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sheffield Childrens Hosp, Ctr Pediat Gastroenterol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
来源
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES | 2007年 / 17卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1089/lap.2006.0114
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The small bowel is anatomically difficult to examine and was investigated by invasive, indirect modalities, such as push enteroscopy and small bowel follow- through. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and clinical impact of wireless capsule endoscopy ( WCE) in children. Materials and Methods: Over the last 3 years ( 2002 - 2005), 37 patients with suspected small- bowel disease were investigated with WCE at a median age of 11 years ( range, 16 months - 16 years). The indications for WCE was suspected Crohn's disease ( CD) ( 18), obscure or occult gastrointestinal bleeding ( 7), polyposis syndromes ( 5), protein losing enteropathy ( 4), recurrent abdominal pain ( 2), and malabsorption syndrome ( 1). All patients had preceding upper gastrointestinal endoscopy ( OGD), ileocolonoscopy, and 26 cases had a small bowel follow- through ( SBFT). These results were compared with the findings on WCE. Results: Thirty- three ( 33) cases successfully completed the WCE through the small bowel. Four ( 4) patients were unable to swallow the capsule, 3 of which had to be placed in the duodenum endoscopically. In 3 patients, the capsule remained in the stomach and no small bowel images were obtained. The overall diagnostic yield was 85% ( 28/ 33 patients). The diagnostic findings included CD ( 13), source of gastrointestinal bleeding ( 7), polyposis syndromes ( 3), erosive enteropathy and patchy lymphangiectasia ( 4), and intussusception ( 1). WCE was found to be more sensitive for small bowel pathology than SBFT ( 20 vs. 6 [ 30% sensitivity, compared to WCE]) and endoscopic investigations ( 28 vs. 12 [ 43% sensitivity compared to WCE]). As a result of WCE findings, there was a positive alteration in the management in 28 of 33 ( 85%) cases. Conclusions: WCE is a novel, noninvasive, and useful tool for the investigation of the small intestine in children. It is superior and more sensitive than other conventional endoscopic and radiologic investigations in the assessment of the small bowel. It can help in guiding surgical decisions and should be routinely integrated as a part of the diagnostic work- up of small bowel pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 370
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]  
Ge ZZ, 2004, WORLD J GASTROENTERO, V10, P1349
[12]   Wireless capsule endoscopy [J].
Iddan, G ;
Meron, G ;
Glukhovsky, A ;
Swain, P .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6785) :417-417
[13]  
LEWIS BS, 2000, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V32, P369
[14]   Current status of small bowel radiography [J].
Maglinte, DDT ;
Kelvin, FM ;
OConnor, K ;
Lappas, JC ;
Chernish, SM .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 1996, 21 (03) :247-257
[15]   Multicenter retrospective evaluation of capsule endoscopy in clinical routine [J].
Maieron, A ;
Hubner, D ;
Blaha, B ;
Deutsch, C ;
Schickmair, T ;
Ziachehabi, A ;
Kerstan, E ;
Knoflach, P .
ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 36 (10) :864-868
[16]   Wireless capsule endoscopy: a comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gastroscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding [J].
Mylonaki, M ;
Fritscher-Ravens, A ;
Swain, P .
GUT, 2003, 52 (08) :1122-1126
[17]   The current role of the barium examination of the small intestine [J].
Nolan, DJ ;
Traill, ZC .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (11) :809-820
[18]  
O'Loughlin Colm J., 2003, American Journal of Gastroenterology, V98, pS74
[19]   Diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of capsule endoscopy [J].
Rastogi, A ;
Schoen, RE ;
Slivka, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (06) :959-964
[20]   Wireless capsule endoscopy for obscure small-bowel disorders: Final results of the first pediatric controlled trial [J].
Sant'Anna, AMGD ;
Dubois, JE ;
Miron, MC ;
Seidman, EG .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 3 (03) :264-270