Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by acoustic surveys: conservation implications

被引:263
作者
Russo, D [1 ]
Jones, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol BS8 1UG, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03422.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
We determined habitat use by foraging bats by broad-band acoustic surveys in 10 habitat types from a Mediterranean area (southern Italy). We applied discriminant functions to identify time-expanded echolocation calls from free-flying bats. Moon phase and cloud cover had no effect on bat activity. Only Hypsugo savii was influenced by temperature, and activity of Myotis daubentonii and Myotis capaccinii was reduced at higher wind speeds. Both total numbers of bat passes and feeding buzzes were highest over rivers and lakes. Pipistrellus kuhlii and H. savii were most frequently recorded. Pipistrellus kuhlii, Pipistrellus pipistrellus and Tadarida teniotis proved generalists in using foraging habitats. Water sites and conifer plantations were respectively the most and the least used habitats by H. savii. Rivers were especially important to Myotis bats, Miniopterus schreibersii and Pipistrellus pygmaeus. Unlike P. kuhlii, P. pipistrellus was frequent in beech woodlands; P. pygniaeus made a considerable use of chestnut woodlands and Myotis spp. were moderately active in both these woodland types. A large number of endangered or vulnerable species featured in riparian habitats, broadleaved woodlands and olive groves. Riparian and woodland habitats constitute an important target for conservation. Typical land use forms such as woodlands used for chestnut production and traditionally managed olive groves should be encouraged in conservation plans. The negative impact of urbanisation on bats might be counteracted by fostering trees, gardens and small cultivated patches. Farmland practices should encourage landscape complexity and limit the use of pesticides.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 209
页数:13
相关论文
共 97 条
[41]  
Kiefer Andreas, 2001, Myotis, V39, P5
[42]  
KOKUREWICZ T., 1995, Myotis, V32-33, P155
[43]   COMPARISON OF MIST NETS AND ULTRASONIC DETECTORS FOR MONITORING FLIGHT ACTIVITY OF BATS [J].
KUNZ, TH ;
BROCK, CE .
JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY, 1975, 56 (04) :907-911
[44]  
Kunz Thomas H., 1996, P105
[45]   BAT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE IN AN URBAN PARK [J].
KURTA, A ;
TERAMINO, JA .
ECOGRAPHY, 1992, 15 (03) :257-261
[46]  
Lanza B., 1959, FAUNA ITALIA 4 MAMMA, P187
[47]   Bat communities in a fragmented forest landscape on the south-west slopes of New South Wales, Australia [J].
Law, BS ;
Anderson, J ;
Chidel, M .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1999, 88 (03) :333-345
[49]   DISTRIBUTION OF FLYING INSECTS NEAR A LOW HEDGEROW [J].
LEWIS, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1969, 6 (03) :443-&
[50]   PERMEABILITY OF ARTIFICIAL WINDBREAKS AND DISTRIBUTION OF FLYING INSECTS IN LEEWARD SHELTERED ZONE [J].
LEWIS, T ;
STEPENSO.JW .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1966, 58 (03) :355-&