Can statin therapy reduce the risk of melanoma? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:38
作者
Bonovas, Stefanos [1 ,2 ]
Nikolopoulos, Georgios [2 ]
Filioussi, Kalitsa
Peponi, Evangelia [3 ]
Bagos, Pantelis [4 ]
Sitaras, Nikolaos M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Athens, Greece
[3] Univ Zurich Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Univ Cent Greece, Dept Biomed Informat, Lamia, Greece
关键词
Chemoprevention; 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors; Melanoma; Statins; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CANCER-RISK; CORONARY EVENTS; SIMVASTATIN; PRAVASTATIN; PREVENTION; LOVASTATIN; DISEASE; QUALITY; APOPTOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s10654-009-9396-x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A growing body of literature suggests that statins may have a chemopreventive potential against melanoma through pleiotropic anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and antiangiogenesis mechanisms. Our aim was to examine this association through a detailed meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A comprehensive search for trials published up to June 2009 was performed, reviews of each study were conducted and data were abstracted. Prior to meta-analysis, the studies were evaluated for publication bias and heterogeneity. Pooled relative risk estimates (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed- and the random-effects models. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Sixteen RCTs of statins for cardiovascular outcomes, involving 62,568 individuals with a mean age of 60 years and an average follow-up of nearly 4.7 years, contributed to the analysis. We found no evidence of publication bias (P = 0.47) or heterogeneity among the studies (P = 0.25). Statin use did not significantly affect the risk of developing melanoma assuming either a fixed- (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.67-1.26), or a random-effects model (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.62-1.36). This neutral effect was further supported by the results of subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Our findings do not support a protective effect of statins against melanoma.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[22]   AN EMPIRICAL-STUDY OF THE POSSIBLE RELATION OF TREATMENT DIFFERENCES TO QUALITY SCORES IN CONTROLLED RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
EMERSON, JD ;
BURDICK, E ;
HOAGLIN, DC ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
CHALMERS, TC .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1990, 11 (05) :339-352
[23]   BIAS IN METAANALYTIC RESEARCH [J].
FELSON, DT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (08) :885-892
[24]   Melanoma chemoprevention [J].
Francis, Shayla O. ;
Mahlberg, Matthew J. ;
Johnson, Kathryn R. ;
Ming, Michael E. ;
Dellavalle, Robert P. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 55 (05) :849-861
[25]   Statins, fibrates, and melanoma risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Freeman, Scott R. ;
Drake, Amanda L. ;
Heilig, Lauren F. ;
Graber, Marla ;
McNealy, Kristie ;
Schilling, Lisa M. ;
Dellavalle, Robert P. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (21) :1538-1546
[26]   The 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, simvastatin, lovastatin and mevastatin inhibit proliferation and invasion of melanoma cells [J].
Glynn, Sharon A. ;
O'Sullivan, Dermot ;
Eustace, Alex J. ;
Clynes, Martin ;
O'Donovan, Norma .
BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)
[27]   INVITED COMMENTARY - A CRITICAL-LOOK AT SOME POPULAR METAANALYTIC METHODS [J].
GREENLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 140 (03) :290-296
[28]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[29]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558
[30]  
JANI JP, 1993, INVAS METAST, V13, P314