How predictive are self-reported strategies for their actual use?

被引：36

作者：

Artelt, C ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Max Planck Inst Bildungsforsch, FB Erziehungswissensch & Bildungssyst, D-14195 Berlin, Germany

来源：

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE | 2000年 / 14卷 / 2-3期

关键词：

learning strategies; action research; retrospective self-reports;

D O I：

10.1024//1010-0652.14.23.72

中图分类号：

G44 [教育心理学];

学科分类号：

0402 ; 040202 ;

摘要：

Following some basic thoughts concerning the quality of retrospective self-reports the necessity of analyzing the predictive validity of learning-strategy-questionnaires is pointed out. The study presented is aimed at such comparison between students' retrospective self-reports about strategic learning and their actual use of these strategies. For this purpose we analyzed the use of learning strategies of 270 4(th), 6(th), and 8(th) graders while studying a text in individual sessions and compared it to students' self-reported use of strategies in a questionnaire referring to the same domain. Neither for single strategies nor for strategy-scales substantial relations between retrospective self-reports and the actual use of strategies could be found. Taken together the participating students - relatively to their actual use - tended to overestimate their strategic competence and performance. The presented results indicate that the predictive validity of questionnaire-based strategy data of students of this age can be seriously questioned.

引用

页码：72 / 84

页数：13

共 44 条

[21] Jonas K, 1996, Z SOZIALPSYCHOL, V27, P18
[22] SELF-REPORTED LEARNING-STRATEGIES AND LEARNING FROM EXPOSITORY TEXT
KARDASH, CAM
AMLUND, JT
[J]. CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 16 (02) : 117 - 138
[23] Kinnunen R., 1995, LEARN INSTR, V52, P143, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00009-R, 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00009-R]
[24] Krapp Andreas, 1993, Unterrichtswissenschaft, V21, P291
[25] LOMPSCHER J, 1994, 9 LLF U INT ZENTR LE
[26] Lompscher J., 1996, EMPIRISCHE PADAGOGIK, V10, P245
[27] LOMPSCHER J, 1998, 18 LLF U INT ZENTR L
[28] Lonka K., 1994, Learning and Instruction, V4, P253, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90026-4, 10.1016/0959-4752, DOI 10.1016/0959-4752]
[29] QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING .1. OUTCOME AND PROCESS
MARTON, F
SALJO, R
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 46 (FEB) : 4 - 11
[30] Marton F., 1984, EXPERIENCE LEARNING

← 1 2 3 4 5 →