Additional Queen Square (QS) screening items improve the test accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) after acute stroke

被引:5
作者
Chan, Edgar [1 ,2 ]
Garritsen, Eva [2 ]
Altendorff, Samantha [1 ]
Turner, David [3 ]
Simister, Robert [2 ,3 ]
Werring, David J. [2 ,3 ]
Cipolotti, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Dept Neuropsychol, Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[2] UCL Queen Sq Inst Neurol, Stroke Res Ctr, London, England
[3] Univ Coll London Hosp, Comprehens Stroke Serv, London, England
关键词
Cognition; Stroke; Neuropsychology; Sensitivity; Specificity; Executive functions; ASSESSMENT BATTERY; ISCHEMIC-STROKE; IMPAIRMENT; REHABILITATION; RECOVERY; DEFICITS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jns.2019.116442
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a popular cognitive screening tool used in stroke, but lacks sensitivity for detecting impairment in stroke-relevant domains of processing speed, non-verbal memory and executive functions. Our aim was to assess whether the test accuracy of the MoCA can be improved with additional tailored screening items targeting these three domains. Methods: We included 196 patients admitted to an acute stroke unit at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square (QS), London. Participants completed the MoCA as well as a series of additional QS-screening items designed to assess speed of processing, non-verbal memory and executive functions. Performance on the MoCA and QS screening items was compared with performance on "gold standard" neuropsychological assessment. Results: In our sample, 22% of patients were classified as "cognitively intact" on the traditional MoCA alone (>= 25), However, when tested on the QS-screening items, 40% of these patients failed on speed of processing, 56% failed on non-verbal memory and 26% failed on executive functions. Compared with neuropsychological assessment, the QS-screening items had good sensitivity (QS-Speed: 0.85; QS-Vis: 0.71; QS-EF: 0.73) and modest specificity (QS-Speed: 0.59; QS-Vis: 0.39; QS-EF: 0.54), regardless of stroke lateralisation. Conclusion: Additional screening items detected impairments in speed of processing, non-verbal memory and executive functions over and above those captured using the standard MoCA. The use of these QS-screening items improves the detection of post-stroke cognitive deficits in domains not adequately covered by the standard MoCA.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
[Anonymous], J NEUROL
[2]
[Anonymous], NEUROL SCI
[3]
[Anonymous], NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL I
[4]
A VISUAL RETENTION TEST FOR CLINICAL USE [J].
BENTON, AL .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1945, 54 (03) :212-216
[5]
Cognitive screening in the acute stroke setting [J].
Blackburn, Daniel J. ;
Bafadhel, Leila ;
Randall, Marc ;
Harkness, Kirsty A. .
AGE AND AGEING, 2013, 42 (01) :113-116
[6]
SCREENING FOR COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT AFTER STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES AND CLINICAL UTILITY [J].
Burton, Louisa ;
Tyson, Sarah F. .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2015, 47 (03) :193-203
[7]
The test accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) by stroke lateralisation [J].
Chan, Edgar ;
Altendorff, Samantha ;
Healy, Colm ;
Werring, David J. ;
Cipolotti, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 373 :100-104
[8]
Limitations of the Trail Making Test Part-B in Assessing Frontal Executive Dysfunction [J].
Chan, Edgar ;
MacPherson, Sarah E. ;
Robinson, Gail ;
Turner, Martha ;
Lecce, Francesca ;
Shallice, Tim ;
Cipolotti, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 21 (02) :169-174
[9]
Underestimation of cognitive impairments by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in an acute stroke unit population [J].
Chan, Edgar ;
Khan, Sabah ;
Oliver, Rupert ;
Gill, Sumanjit K. ;
Werring, David J. ;
Cipolotti, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 343 (1-2) :176-179
[10]
Coughlan A., 1985, ADULT MEMORY INFORM