Effective and organ doses from scanography and zonography:: a comparison with periapical radiography

被引:16
作者
Ekestubbe, A
Thilander-Klang, A
Lith, A
Gröndahl, HG
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Fac Odontol, Sahlgrenska Acad, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Radiat Phys, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Goteborg Publ Dent Serv, Clin Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
radiography; dental; radiation dosage;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr/24877187
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare absorbed and effective doses from scanographic and zonographic examinations performed in the Scanora(R) unit with intraoral periapical radiography. Methods: Absorbed dose measurements were made on an anthropomorphic phantom head with LiF thermoluminescent dosemeters in the regions of the pituitary gland, eye lenses, parotid glands, submandibular glands, thyroid gland and skin. Energy imparted was calculated from the measurements of air collision kerma and effective doses by using the quotient 24 mSv J(-1) between energy imparted and effective dose. The upper and lower third molar region was examined with intraoral radiographs and with ramus scanograms, dental scanograms and dental zonograms. Radiation dose measurements were also performed for Scanora(R) panoramic radiography (jaw and dental). Results: The effective doses for the ramus and dental scanograms were 0.01 mSv, similar or lower than for intraoral radiography. Zonography yielded the highest effective dose (0.03 mSv). Except for the skin doses, the salivary glands received the highest doses. Salivary gland doses were slightly higher from narrow beam than from intraoral radiography. Conclusions: Detail narrow beam radiography with the Scanora(R) is an alternative to periapical radiography and is preferred, from a radiation dose point of view, over zonography.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Digital skeletal radiography - Reduction of absorbed dose by adaptation of exposure factors and image processing [J].
Axelsson, B ;
Petersen, U ;
Wiltz, HJ .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2001, 42 (06) :592-598
[2]   ENERGY IMPARTED TO THE PATIENT IN DIAGNOSTIC-RADIOLOGY - CALCULATION OF CONVERSION FACTORS FOR DETERMINING THE ENERGY IMPARTED FROM MEASUREMENTS OF THE AIR COLLISION KERMA INTEGRATED OVER BEAM AREA [J].
CARLSSON, GA ;
CARLSSON, CA ;
PERSLIDEN, J .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1984, 29 (11) :1329-1341
[3]   Effect of dose reduction in digital dental panoramic radiography on image quality [J].
Dannewitz, B ;
Hassfeld, S ;
Eickholz, P ;
Mühling, J .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (01) :50-55
[4]   Effects of dose reduction on the detectability of standardized radiolucent lesions in digital panoramic radiography [J].
Dula, K ;
Sanderink, G ;
van der Stelt, PF ;
Mini, R ;
Buser, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 1998, 86 (02) :227-233
[5]  
Dula K, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P80
[6]   Quality of digital pre-implant tomography:: comparison of film-screen images with storage phosphor images at normal and low dose [J].
Ekestubbe, A ;
Gröndahl, HG ;
Molander, B .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 32 (05) :322-326
[7]  
Farman A G, 2000, Dent Clin North Am, V44, P257
[8]   Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure [J].
Farman, TT ;
Farman, AG ;
Kelly, MS ;
Firriolo, FJ ;
Yancey, JM ;
Stewart, AV .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 (01) :36-40
[9]  
Gibbs S J, 1988, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V17, P15
[10]  
Gibbs S J, 1987, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, V16, P67