Therapeutic implications of in-stent restenosis located at the stent edge.

被引:17
作者
Alfonso, F [1 ]
Melgares, R
Mainar, V
Lezaún, R
Vázquez, N
Tascón, J
Pomar, F
Cequier, A
Angel, J
Pérez-Vizcayno, MJ
Sabaté, M
Bañuelos, C
Fernández, C
García, JM
机构
[1] Univ Madrid, Hosp Clin San Carlos, Madrid 3, Spain
[2] Univ Hosp, Granada, Spain
[3] Alicante Hosp, Alicante, Spain
[4] Navarra Hosp, Pamplona, Spain
[5] Univ Hosp, La Coruna, Spain
[6] Univ Madrid, Hosp 12 Octubre, Madrid 3, Spain
[7] Gen Hosp, Valencia, Spain
[8] Univ Barcelona, Bellvitge Hosp, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Gen Valle Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
[10] Univ Hosp, Oporto, Portugal
关键词
angioplasty; stents; restenosis;
D O I
10.1016/j.ehj.2004.07.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) several anatomic subgroups have been identified. ISR affecting the stent edge (EDG) is a poorly characterised subgroup with undefined therapeutic implications. We sought to determine the implications of ISR affecting the stent EDG. Methods and results 450 patients included in the "Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs elective Stenting" (RIBS) randomized study, were analysed. EDG ISR was predefined in the protocol and the pattern of ISR analysed in a centralized core-lab. Fifty-two patients (12%) had EDG ISR (29 stent group, 23 balloon arm). Patients with EDG ISR had less severe [minimal lumen diameter (MLD) (0.78 +/- 0.3 vs 0.66 +/- 0.3 mm, p = 0.05)] and shorter lesions (lesion length 10.2 +/- 6 vs 13.2 +/- 7 mm, p = 0.003). Patients with EDG ISR more frequently required crossover (12% vs 3%, p = 0.006) but eventually the immediate angiographic result and the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome was similar to that found in patients without EDG ISR. Patients with EDG ISR treated in the balloon and stent arms had similar baseline characteristics. However, after intervention, the immediate angiographic result was better in the stent arm (MLD 2.79 +/- 0.4 vs 2.35 +/- 0.3 mm, p = 0.001). This difference persisted at late follow-up: MLD (1.93 +/- 0.7 vs 1.39 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.01), recurrent restenosis (20% vs 50%, p = 0.03). In addition, the 1-year event-free survival was significantly better (83% vs 52%, log rank p = 0.01; Cox HR 0.28, 95%CI 0.09-0.79) in the stent arm. Moreover, stent implantation was an independent predictor of freedom from target vessel revascularization (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.03-0.67, p = 0.003). Conclusions EDG ISR constitutes a specific subgroup with relevant therapeutic implications. In patients with EDG ISR, repeat stent implantation provides better clinical and angiographic outcome than conventional balloon angioplasty. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The European Society of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1829 / 1835
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Cutting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: A matched comparison with rotational atherectomy, additional stent implantation and balloon angioplasty [J].
Adamian, M ;
Colombo, A ;
Briguori, C ;
Nishida, T ;
Marsico, F ;
Di Mario, C ;
Albiero, R ;
Moussa, I ;
Moses, JW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 38 (03) :672-679
[2]   Fate of stent-related side branches after coronary intervention in patients with in-stent restenosis [J].
Alfonso, F ;
Hernández, C ;
Pérez-Vizcayno, MJ ;
Hernández, R ;
Fernández-Ortíz, A ;
Escaned, J ;
Bañuelos, C ;
Sabaté, M ;
Sanmartín, M ;
Fernández, C ;
Macaya, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (05) :1549-1556
[3]   A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis [J].
Alfonso, F ;
Zueco, J ;
Cequier, A ;
Mantilla, R ;
Bethencourt, A ;
López-Minguez, JR ;
Angel, J ;
Augé, JM ;
Gómez-Recio, M ;
Morís, C ;
Seabra-Gomes, R ;
Perez-Vizcayno, MJ ;
Macaya, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 42 (05) :796-805
[4]   Long-term outcome and determinants of event-free survival in patients treated with balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis [J].
Alfonso, F ;
Pérez-Vizcayno, MJ ;
Hernández, R ;
Goicolea, J ;
Fernández-Ortíz, A ;
Escaned, J ;
Bañuelos, C ;
Fernández, C ;
Macaya, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1999, 83 (08) :1268-+
[5]   MANAGEMENT OF RESTENOSIS WITHIN THE PALMAZ-SCHATZ CORONARY STENT (THE UNITED-STATES MULTICENTER EXPERIENCE) [J].
BAIM, DS ;
LEVINE, MJ ;
LEON, MB ;
LEVINE, S ;
ELLIS, SG ;
SCHATZ, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (04) :364-366
[6]  
Bauters C, 1998, CIRCULATION, V97, P318
[7]   In-stent restenosis: Long-term outcome and predictors of subsequent target lesion revascularization after repeat balloon angioplasty [J].
Bossi, I ;
Klersy, C ;
Black, AJ ;
Cortina, R ;
Choussat, R ;
Cassagneau, B ;
Jordan, C ;
Laborde, JC ;
Laurent, JP ;
Bernies, M ;
Fajadet, J ;
Marco, J .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (06) :1569-1576
[8]   The contribution of "mechanical" problems to in-stent restenosis: An intravascular ultrasonographic analysis of 1090 consecutive in-stent restenosis lesions [J].
Castagna, MT ;
Mintz, GS ;
Leiboff, BO ;
Ahmed, JM ;
Mehran, R ;
Satler, LF ;
Kent, KM ;
Pichard, AD ;
Weissman, NJ .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2001, 142 (06) :970-974
[9]   Balloon angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: Immediate results and 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate [J].
Eltchaninoff, H ;
Koning, R ;
Tron, C ;
Gupta, V ;
Cribier, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (04) :980-984
[10]  
ERBEL R, 1988, NEW ENGL J MED, V339, P1672