Comparative evaluation of the VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System (AES) in five UK hospitals

被引:39
作者
Barry, J
Brown, A
Ensor, V
Lakhani, U
Petts, D
Warren, C
Winstanley, T
机构
[1] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Ninewells Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland
[4] Guys & St Thomas Hosp, Dept Infect, London SE1 9RT, England
[5] Basildon Hosp, Basildon, Essex, England
关键词
VITEK; 2; expert; automated AST;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkg234
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: We carried out an evaluation of VITEK 2 in five UK laboratories, comparing results with 'gold standard' agar-dilution MIC data, assessing its ability to recognize resistant phenotypes and comparing results with those generated by routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods. Methods: Laboratories tested a collection of 82 strains selected on the basis of their challenging and characterized resistance mechanisms. Results: In comparison with the reference MIC method, VITEK 2 gave an essential agreement of 304/315 (enterococci), 1619/1674 (staphylococci) and 2937/3074 (Gram-negative bacilli): overall 96.0% agreement. Corresponding category (SIR) agreements with VITEK 2 were 247/252,1496/ 1561 and 2478/2626 (overall 95.1%). Using five routine methodologies, category agreements ranged from 58/63 to 45/45; 222/232 to 174/174, and 333/372 to 250/259 for the three organism groups with an overall agreement of 95.0%. In contrast to VITEK 2 Advanced Expert System (AES), routine microbiology laboratories did not attempt to detect resistance mechanisms for every antibiotic studied. VITEK 2 AES detected all 19 resistance mechanisms in enterococci: where applicable, routine methods detected 14, 10 and 10. Of 30 resistance mechanisms in staphylococci, VITEK 2 AES detected 25 compared with 23, 20,17 and 18 detected by routine methods. Finally, of 44 resistance mechanisms in Gram-negative bacilli, VITEK 2 AES detected 30 compared with 30,23,15 and 10 detected by routine methods. Conclusions: VITEK 2 performed susceptibility tests accurately and the AES detected and interpreted resistance mechanisms appropriately. Heavy inocula in a liquid medium possibly favour better expression of certain resistance determinants. Although certain routine microbiology methods performed adequately, VITEK 2 AES offers a rapid, standardized method suited to laboratories lacking experience of resistance mechanisms and/or those not testing an appropriate number, or range, of antibiotics to detect resistance phenotypes.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1202
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ANDREWS J, 2002, BSAC DISC DIFFUSION
[2]   Evaluation of the Oxoid Aura image system for measuring zones of inhibition with the disc diffusion technique [J].
Andrews, JM ;
Boswell, FJ ;
Wise, R .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 46 (04) :535-540
[3]   BSAC standardized disc susceptibility testing method [J].
Andrews, JM .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 48 :43-57
[4]   Validation of the VITEK2 and the Advance Expert System with a collection of Enterobacteriaceae harboring extended spectrum or inhibitor resistant β-lactamases [J].
Cantón, R ;
Pérez-Vázquez, M ;
Oliver, A ;
Coque, TM ;
Loza, E ;
Ponz, F ;
Baquero, F .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2001, 41 (1-2) :65-70
[5]   Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in klebsiellae with the oxoid combination disk method [J].
Carter, MW ;
Oakton, KJ ;
Warner, M ;
Livermore, DM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 38 (11) :4228-4232
[6]  
Courvalin Patrice, 1996, Clin Microbiol Infect, V2 Suppl 1, pS26, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-0691.1996.tb00872.x
[7]   CLINICAL IMPACT OF RAPID IN-VITRO SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING AND BACTERIAL IDENTIFICATION [J].
DOERN, GV ;
VAUTOUR, R ;
GAUDET, M ;
LEVY, B .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1994, 32 (07) :1757-1762
[8]  
FAIERS M, 1991, MULTIPOINT METHODS C
[9]  
*FDA, 1991, FED GUID REV CRIT AS
[10]   Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system for rapid identification of medically relevant gram-negative rods [J].
Funke, G ;
Monnet, D ;
deBernardis, C ;
von Graevenitz, A ;
Freney, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (07) :1948-1952