Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events

被引:156
作者
Yawn, BP
Suman, VJ
Jacobsen, SJ
机构
[1] Olmsted Med Ctr, Dept Res, Rochester, MN 55904 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci, Biostat Sect, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Clin Epidemiol Sect, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
maternal recall; reliability; accuracy; pregnancy; prematurity;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00304-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Women themselves are often the most convenient source of information regarding their pregnancy and birth outcomes such as prematurity. However, the ability of mothers to recall birth information and the accuracy of information they do recall has rarely been assessed. This study used a mail survey of women who delivered either term or preterm infants in Rochester, Minnesota, between 1980 and 1985. Maternal reports of circumstances and outcome of delivery were compared to data abstracted from the medical records. Maternal ability to recall and report events varied from 99.5% for smoking during pregnancy to 85% for infant's gestational age at birth. Agreement between medical record and maternal report was very high for perinatal events such as delivery by cesarean section, preexisting diabetes, and smoking. Percent negative agreement was quite high when comparing information on rare events such as placental abruption. Recall of gestational age was better for women delivering preterm infants but uncommon in all women. Maternal reports of perinatal events in which they directly participated such as cesarean section can be accurately and reliably reported 10 to 15 years after the birth. Gestational age is reported less accurately and with different rates of recall for mothers with term and preterm deliveries. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 405
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982) :1085-1087
[2]   JOB STRESS AND ADVERSE OUTCOME OF PREGNANCY - A CAUSAL LINK OR RECALL BIAS [J].
BRANDT, LPA ;
NIELSEN, CV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 135 (03) :302-311
[3]   RECORDS, RECALL LOSS, AND RECALL BIAS IN PREGNANCY - A COMPARISON OF INTERVIEW AND MEDICAL RECORDS DATA OF PREGNANT AND POSTNATAL WOMEN [J].
BRYANT, HE ;
VISSER, N ;
LOVE, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1989, 79 (01) :78-80
[4]   RECALL BIAS IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES - AN EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK [J].
CHOUINARD, E ;
WALTER, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (02) :245-254
[5]  
CICHETTI DV, 1990, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V43, P551
[6]   VALIDITY OF PARENTAL REPORT OF A CHILDS MEDICAL HISTORY IN OTITIS-MEDIA RESEARCH [J].
DALY, KA ;
LINDGREN, B ;
GIEBINK, GS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 139 (11) :1116-1121
[7]  
EATONEVANS J, 1986, HUM NUTR-APPL NUTR, V40A, P171
[8]   HIGH AGREEMENT BUT LOW KAPPA .1. THE PROBLEMS OF 2 PARADOXES [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
CICCHETTI, DV .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 (06) :543-549
[9]   MATERNAL RECALL AND MEDICAL RECORDS - AN EXAMINATION OF EVENTS DURING PREGNANCY, CHILDBIRTH, AND EARLY INFANCY [J].
GITHENS, PB ;
GLASS, CA ;
SLOAN, FA ;
ENTMAN, SS .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1993, 20 (03) :136-141
[10]   AGREEMENT BETWEEN QUESTIONNAIRE DATA AND MEDICAL RECORDS - THE EVIDENCE FOR ACCURACY OF RECALL [J].
HARLOW, SD ;
LINET, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1989, 129 (02) :233-248