Guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell and bacterial counts

被引:202
作者
Jayarao, BM [1 ]
Pillai, SR [1 ]
Sawant, AA [1 ]
Wolfgang, DR [1 ]
Hegde, NV [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Vet Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
bulk tank milk; somatic cell; bacterial count; milk quality;
D O I
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73493-1
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study was conducted to establish guidelines for monitoring bulk tank milk somatic cell count and bacterial counts, and to understand the relationship between different bacterial groups that occur in bulk tank milk. One hundred twenty-six dairy farms in 14 counties of Pennsylvania participated, each providing one bulk tank milk sample every 15 d for 2 mo. The 4 bulk tank milk samples from each farm were examined for bulk tank somatic cell count and bacterial counts including standard plate count, preliminary incubation count, laboratory pasteurization count, coagulase-negative staphylococcal count, environmental streptococcal count, coliform count, and gram-negative noncoliform count. The milk samples were also examined for presence of Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Mycoplasma. The bacterial counts of 4 bulk tank milk samples examined over an 8-wk period were averaged and expressed as mean bacterial count per milliliter. The study revealed that an increase in the frequency of isolation of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae was significantly associated with an increased bulk tank somatic cell count. Paired correlation analysis showed that there was low correlation between different bacterial counts. Bulk tank milk with low (< 5000 cfu/mL) standard plate count also had a significantly low level of mean bulk tank somatic cell count (< 200,000 cells/mL), preliminary incubation count (< 10,000 cfu/mL), laboratory pasteurization count (< 100 cfu/mL), coagulase-negative staphylococci and environmental streptococcal counts (< 500 cfu/mL), and noncoliform count (< 200 cfu/mL). Coliform count was less likely to be associated with somatic cell or other bacterial counts. Herd size and farm management practices had considerable influence on somatic cell and bacterial counts in bulk tank milk. Dairy herds that used automatic milking detachers, sand as bedding material, dip cups for teat dipping instead of spraying, and practiced pre- and postdipping had significantly lower bulk tank somatic cell and/or bacterial counts. In conclusion, categorized bulk tank somatic cell and bacterial counts could serve as indicators and facilitate monitoring of herd udder health and milk quality.
引用
收藏
页码:3561 / 3573
页数:13
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows [J].
Laevens, H ;
Deluyker, H ;
Schukken, YH ;
De Meulemeester, L ;
Vandermeersch, R ;
De Muelenaere, E ;
De Kruif, A .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1997, 80 (12) :3219-3226
[32]   Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk [J].
Ma, Y ;
Ryan, C ;
Barbano, DM ;
Galton, DM ;
Rudan, MA ;
Boor, KJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2000, 83 (02) :264-274
[33]  
Marshall R T., 1992, STANDARD METHODS EXA
[34]   AN IN-LINE SAMPLING TECHNIQUE TO MEASURE THE BACTERIAL-CONTAMINATION OF MILK DURING MILKING [J].
MCKINNON, CH ;
BRAMLEY, AJ ;
MORANT, SV .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 1988, 55 (01) :33-40
[35]  
MICKELSON A, 1998, P 37 NAT MAST COUNC, P26
[36]  
Murphy S., 1997, NAT MAS COUNC REG M, P34
[37]  
*NAT MAST COUNC, 1996, CURR CONC BOV MAST, P40
[38]  
NORMAN HD, 2000, J DAIRY SCI, V83, P2805
[39]  
Panes JJ, 1979, REPORT SURVEY QUALIT
[40]   PREMILKING UDDER HYGIENE [J].
PANKEY, JW .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1989, 72 (05) :1308-1312