Clinical Outcomes with β-Blockers for Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:226
作者
Bangalore, Sripal [1 ]
Makani, Harikrishna [2 ]
Radford, Martha [1 ]
Thakur, Kamia [1 ]
Toklu, Bora [3 ]
Katz, Stuart D. [1 ]
DiNicolantonio, James J. [4 ,5 ]
Devereaux, P. J. [6 ]
Alexander, Karen P. [7 ]
Wetterslev, Jorn [8 ]
Messerli, Franz H. [2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] St Lukes Roosevelt Hosp, Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY 10025 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
[4] St Lukes Hosp, Mid Amer Heart Inst, Kansas City, MO 64111 USA
[5] Wegmans Pharm, Ithaca, NY USA
[6] Populat Hlth Res Inst, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[8] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
beta-blockers; Myocardial infarction; Outcomes; Reperfusion; CHEST-PAIN; VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; NORWEGIAN MULTICENTER; EARLY INTERVENTION; SUDDEN DEATHS; SIZE; PROPRANOLOL; METOPROLOL; REDUCTION; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.05.032
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Debate exists about the efficacy of beta-blockers in myocardial infarction and their required duration of usage in contemporary practice. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE/EMBASE/CENTRAL search for randomized trials evaluating beta-blockers in myocardial infarction enrolling at least 100 patients. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Analysis was performed stratifying trials into reperfusion-era (> 50% undergoing reperfusion or receiving aspirin/statin) or pre-reperfusion-era trials. RESULTS: Sixty trials with 102,003 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. In the acute myocardial infarction trials, a significant interaction (P-interaction = .02) was noted such that beta-blockers reduced mortality in the pre-reperfusion (incident rate ratio [IRR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.94) but not in the reperfusion era (IRR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.92-1.05). In the pre-reperfusion era, beta-blockers reduced cardiovascular mortality (IRR 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98), myocardial infarction (IRR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97), and angina (IRR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95), with no difference for other outcomes. In the reperfusion era, beta(-)blockers reduced myocardial infarction (IRR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.62-0.83) (number needed to treat to benefit [NNTB] = 209) and angina (IRR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.98) (NNTB = 26) at the expense of increase in heart failure (IRR 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16) (number needed to treat to harm [NNTH] = 79), cardiogenic shock (IRR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18-1.41) (NNTH = 90), and drug discontinuation (IRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.55-1.73), with no benefit for other outcomes. Benefits for recurrent myocardial infarction and angina in the reperfusion era appeared to be short term (30 days). CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary practice of treatment of myocardial infarction, beta-blockers have no mortality benefit but reduce recurrent myocardial infarction and angina (short-term) at the expense of increase in heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and drug discontinuation. The guideline authors should reconsider the strength of recommendations for beta-blockers post myocardial infarction. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:939 / 953
页数:15
相关论文
共 81 条
[41]  
Hjalmarson A, 1981, LANCET, V318, P823, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(81)91101-6.PUBMED
[42]   Effect of Early Metoprolol on Infarct Size in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The Effect of Metoprolol in Cardioprotection During an Acute Myocardial Infarction (METOCARD-CNIC) Trial [J].
Ibanez, Borja ;
Macaya, Carlos ;
Sanchez-Brunete, Vicente ;
Pizarro, Gonzalo ;
Fernandez-Friera, Leticia ;
Mateos, Alonso ;
Fernandez-Ortiz, Antonio ;
Garcia-Ruiz, Jose M. ;
Garcia-Alvarez, Ana ;
Iniguez, Andres ;
Jimenez-Borreguero, Jesus ;
Lopez-Romero, Pedro ;
Fernandez-Jimenez, Rodrigo ;
Goicolea, Javier ;
Ruiz-Mateos, Borja ;
Bastante, Teresa ;
Arias, Mercedes ;
Iglesias-Vazquez, Jose A. ;
Rodriguez, Maite D. ;
Escalera, Noemi ;
Acebal, Carlos ;
Cabrera, Jose A. ;
Valenciano, Juan ;
Perez de Prado, Armando ;
Fernandez-Campos, Maria J. ;
Casado, Isabel ;
Garcia-Rubira, Juan C. ;
Garcia-Prieto, Jaime ;
Sanz-Rosa, David ;
Cuellas, Carlos ;
Hernandez-Antolin, Rosana ;
Albarran, Agustin ;
Fernandez-Vazquez, Felipe ;
de la Torre-Hernandez, Jose M. ;
Pocock, Stuart ;
Sanz, Gines ;
Fuster, Valentin .
CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (14) :1495-1503
[43]  
JULIAN DG, 1982, LANCET, V1, P1142
[44]  
Lechat P, 1999, LANCET, V353, P9
[45]  
MAZUR NA, 1984, COR VASA, V26, P241
[46]  
Mitchell Rita G, 2002, Am Heart J, V144, pE9, DOI 10.1067/mhj.2002.126114
[47]  
MITTRA B, 1965, LANCET, V2, P607
[48]   Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement [J].
Moher, D ;
Cook, DJ ;
Eastwood, S ;
Olkin, I ;
Rennie, D ;
Stroup, DF .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9193) :1896-1900
[49]   Secondary Preventive Effects of a Calcium Antagonist for Ischemic Heart Attack - Randomized Parallel Comparison With β-Blockers [J].
Nakagomi, Akihiro ;
Kodani, Eitaro ;
Takano, Hitoshi ;
Uchida, Takahiro ;
Sato, Naoki ;
Ibuki, Chikao ;
Kusama, Yoshiki ;
Seino, Yoshihiko ;
Munakata, Kazuo ;
Mizuno, Kyoichi ;
Takano, Teruo .
CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2011, 75 (07) :1696-1705
[50]   TRIAL OF PROPRANOLOL IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION [J].
NORRIS, RM ;
CAUGHEY, DE ;
SCOTT, PJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1968, 2 (5602) :398-&