Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma according to anatomical site and clinico-pathological variant

被引:108
作者
Caini, Saverio [2 ]
Gandini, Sara [1 ]
Sera, Francesco [2 ]
Raimondi, Sara [1 ]
Fargnoli, Maria Concetta [3 ]
Boniol, Mathieu [4 ]
Armstrong, Bruce K. [5 ]
机构
[1] European Inst Oncol, Div Epidemiol & Biostat, I-20141 Milan, Italy
[2] ISPO, Mol & Nutr Epidemiol Unit, Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Aquila, Dept Dermatol, I-67100 Laquila, Italy
[4] Int Agcy Res Canc, F-69372 Lyon, France
[5] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Melanoma; Sun exposure; Phenotype; Naevus; Body site; Neoplasm by site; Neoplasms by histologic type; Epidemiology; Meta-analysis; MALIGNANT-MELANOMA; MELANOCYTIC NEVI; SUN EXPOSURE; UNITED-STATES; PHENOTYPIC CHARACTERISTICS; DIVERGENT PATHWAYS; SUNLIGHT-EXPOSURE; PUBLICATION BIAS; SOLAR KERATOSES; FAMILY-HISTORY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2009.05.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A systematic meta-analysis was performed to evaluate if cutaneous melanoma (CM) risk factors differ depending on body site and histological type. Adjusted estimates were extracted from 24 observational studies, for a total of 16,180 cases. Multivariate random-effects models were used to obtain summary relative risk (RR) estimates for all risk factors by body site and histological type. Summary RRs suggest that high naevus counts are strongly associated with CM on usually not sun exposed sites (p < 0.001) while different patterns of sun exposure show a tendency for higher RRs for CM on usually sun exposed sites than on other body sites (p = 0.087). Continuous pattern was found to be significantly inversely associated with CM for unexposed sites (p = 0.01). RRs also differed by body site for skin (p = 0.01) and hair colour (p = 0.01), and these differences could be attributed to gene variability. This finding seems to suggest different aetiologic pathways of melanoma development by anatomical site. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3054 / 3063
页数:10
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[2]  
Bulliard JL, 1997, INT J CANCER, V72, P231, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970717)72:2<231::AID-IJC5>3.3.CO
[3]  
2-K
[4]  
Carli P, 2003, J NATL CANCER I, V95, P1801, DOI 10.1093/jbci/djg127
[5]  
CHANG YM, 2009, INT J EPIDEMIOL
[6]  
Chen YT, 1996, INT J CANCER, V67, P636, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960904)67:5<636::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-V
[8]   Risk factors for melanoma by body site for whites [J].
Cho, EY ;
Rosner, BA ;
Colditz, GA .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2005, 14 (05) :1241-1244
[9]  
Copas J, 2000, Biostatistics, V1, P247, DOI 10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
[10]   A sensitivity analysis for publication bias in systematic reviews [J].
Copas, JB ;
Shi, JQ .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (04) :251-265