Impact analysis of carbon tax on the renewal planning of energy supply system for an office building

被引:10
作者
Amano, Y. [1 ]
Ito, K. [1 ]
Yoshida, S. [2 ]
Matsuo, K. [1 ]
Hashizume, T. [1 ]
Favrat, D. [3 ]
Marechal, F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Waseda Univ, Res Inst Sci & Engn, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1620044, Japan
[2] Kansai Elect Power Co Inc, Energy Use Res & Dev Ctr, Amagasaki, Hyogo 6610974, Japan
[3] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Ind Energy Syst Lab, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Energy supply system; Renewal planning; Optimization; Carbon tax;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.023
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
An optimal planning method is proposed for the renewal-planning problem of an energy supply system installed into building from economic viewpoint. In this method, the objective function to be minimized is the average annual total cost during the evaluation period of the objective system based on the annualized costs method, and the renewal year is considered as a decision variable together with the renewal system's structure, equipment capacities, and system's operational strategy. This problem is formulated as one of the mixed-integer linear programming problem, and a numerical study is carried out for an office building with the total floor area of 15,000 m(2) by using the GAMS/CPLEX solver. Impact analysis of the carbon tax introduction is mainly studied on the renewal planning mentioned above, and the following results are obtained: (a) The optimal renewal strategy is not affected by the future carbon tax introduction at the standard rate such as 655 Japanese Yen/t-CO(2) (=4.1 (sic)/t-CO(2)) argued presently in Japan. (b) By increasing the above tax rate more than 13 times higher, structure of the optimal renewal system changes suddenly, and equipment with high energy conversion efficiency becomes to be installed in spite of its expensive initial cost. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1040 / 1046
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Brooke A., 1996, GAMS RELEASE 2 25 US
[2]   Choice of nuclear power investments under price uncertainty: Valuing modularity [J].
Gollier, C ;
Proult, D ;
Thais, F ;
Walgenwitz, G .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (04) :667-685
[3]   TIME TO BUILD, OPTION VALUE, AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS [J].
MAJD, S ;
PINDYCK, RS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 18 (01) :7-27
[4]   THE VALUE OF WAITING TO INVEST [J].
MCDONALD, R ;
SIEGEL, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1986, 101 (04) :707-727
[5]  
Olsommer B., 1999, International Journal of Applied Thermodynamics, V2, P97
[6]  
WITTE LC, 1998, IND ENERGY MANAGEMEN, P68
[7]   OPTIMAL SIZING OF A GAS-TURBINE COGENERATION PLANT IN CONSIDERATION OF ITS OPERATIONAL STRATEGY [J].
YOKOYAMA, R ;
ITO, K ;
MATSUMOTO, Y .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1994, 116 (01) :32-38
[8]  
YOSHIDA S, 2005, INT C POW ENG ICOPE, P1
[9]  
YOSHIDA S, 2008, ECOS 2008, V3, P1545