Willingness to pay for road safety and estimates of the risk of death: Evidence from a Swedish contingent valuation study

被引:56
作者
Andersson, Henrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Natl Rd & Transport Res Inst, Dept Transport Econ, SE-10215 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
background risk; contingent valuation; health status; willingness to pay; risk perception; road safety;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.008
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
We examine how WTP for a reduction in road-mortality risk varies with different individual characteristics and how subjective mortality-risk estimates differ from objective (statistical) mortality-risk values. Using data from a Swedish contingent valuation study, we find some support that WTP declines with age and background risk, but we find no support that WTP varies with health status. Further, we find that respondents underassess their own mortality risks, both road- and total-mortality risks, compared to the objective risk measures for Sweden at the time of the survey. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 865
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the US and Canada [J].
Alberini, A ;
Cropper, M ;
Krupnick, A ;
Simon, NB .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 48 (01) :769-792
[2]  
ALBERINI A, 2004, 135 FOND EE MATT
[3]   Willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: Does latency matter? [J].
Alberini, Anna ;
Cropper, Maureen ;
Krupnick, Alan ;
Simon, Nathalie B. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2006, 32 (03) :231-245
[4]  
ALDY JE, 2004, 468 OL CTR LAW EC BU
[5]  
ALDY JE, 2006, 0619 RFF D
[6]   The value of safety as revealed in the Swedish car market: An application of the hedonic pricing approach [J].
Andersson, H .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2005, 30 (03) :211-239
[7]  
ANDERSSON H, 2005, STUDIES HLTH EC, V57
[8]  
[Anonymous], INT YB ENV RESOURCE
[9]  
ARTHUR WB, 1981, AM ECON REV, V71, P54
[10]   Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation [J].
Baron, J .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1997, 14 (03) :301-309