Willingness to pay for road safety and estimates of the risk of death: Evidence from a Swedish contingent valuation study

被引:56
作者
Andersson, Henrik [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Natl Rd & Transport Res Inst, Dept Transport Econ, SE-10215 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
background risk; contingent valuation; health status; willingness to pay; risk perception; road safety;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.008
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
We examine how WTP for a reduction in road-mortality risk varies with different individual characteristics and how subjective mortality-risk estimates differ from objective (statistical) mortality-risk values. Using data from a Swedish contingent valuation study, we find some support that WTP declines with age and background risk, but we find no support that WTP varies with health status. Further, we find that respondents underassess their own mortality risks, both road- and total-mortality risks, compared to the objective risk measures for Sweden at the time of the survey. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 865
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[11]  
BAUM CF, 2003, 545 DEP EC
[12]   On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part I - Caveat investigator [J].
Beattie, J ;
Covey, J ;
Dolan, P ;
Hopkins, L ;
Jones-Lee, M ;
Loomes, G ;
Pidgeon, N ;
Robinson, A ;
Spencer, A .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 17 (01) :5-25
[13]   Individuals' estimates of the risks of death .1. Reassessment of the previous evidence [J].
Benjamin, DK ;
Dougan, WR .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1997, 15 (02) :115-133
[14]   Individuals' estimates of the risks of death: Part II - New evidence [J].
Benjamin, DK ;
Dougan, WR ;
Buschena, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2001, 22 (01) :35-57
[15]   VALUE OF LIFE SAVING - IMPLICATIONS OF CONSUMPTION ACTIVITY [J].
BLOMQUIST, G .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1979, 87 (03) :540-558
[16]  
Blomquist G.C., 2004, Rev. Econ. Househ., V2, P89, DOI DOI 10.1023/B:REHO.0000018024.53114.3A
[17]  
BRAZIER J, 1999, HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS, V3
[18]   Is transport safety more valuable in the air? [J].
Carlsson, F ;
Johansson-Stenman, O ;
Martinsson, P .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2004, 28 (02) :147-163
[19]   Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence [J].
Carson, RT ;
Flores, NE ;
Meade, NF .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2001, 19 (02) :173-210
[20]   On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation: Part 2 - The CV/SG "chained" approach [J].
Carthy, T ;
Chilton, S ;
Covey, D ;
Hopkins, L ;
Jones-Lee, M ;
Loomes, G ;
Pidgeon, N ;
Spencer, A .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1998, 17 (03) :187-213