Randomised clinical trial to assess anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery

被引:74
作者
Fitzpatrick, M
Behan, M
O'Connell, PR
O'Herlihy, C
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Mater Misericordiae Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Mater Misericordiae Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[4] Univ Coll Dublin, Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Radiol, Dublin 2, Ireland
[5] Univ Coll Dublin, Natl Matern Hosp, Dept Surg, Dublin 2, Ireland
[6] Univ Coll Dublin, Mater Misericordiae Hosp, Dept Surg, Dublin 2, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-0328(03)02973-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare, in a prospective, randomised controlled trial, differences in anal sphincter function following forceps or vacuum assisted vaginal delivery in an institution practising standardised management of labour. Design Prospective, randomised controlled trial. Setting Tertiary-referral maternity teaching hospital. Population One hundred and thirty women. Methods Primiparous women were recruited antenatally and if an instrumental delivery was indicated, were randomised to either a vacuum or low-cavity, non-rotational forceps assisted delivery. Follow up consisted of a symptom questionnaire, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound at three months postpartum. Main outcome measures Faecal continence scores, anal manometry, endoanal ultrasound. Results Sixty-one women delivered with forceps assistance (40 for failure to progress in the second stage) and 69 with vacuum assistance (33 for failure to progress); 16/69 vacuum deliveries proceeded to a forceps assisted delivery (23%). There were no statistical differences in the antecedent antenatal factors between the two groups. A third degree perineal tear followed 10 (16%) forceps and 5 (7%) vacuum deliveries. Based on intention-to-treat analysis, 36 (59%) women complained of altered faecal continence after forceps delivery compared with 23 (33%) following vacuum delivery three months postpartum (RR 2.88, 95% CI 1.41-5.88). Endoanal ultrasound was reported as abnormal following 34 (56%) forceps deliveries and 34 (49%) vacuum deliveries (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.65-258). After exclusion of 'failed vacuum', median anal canal resting pressure was significantly lower following forceps delivery compared with vacuum delivery alone (P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in degree of ultrasound abnormality between the two groups. Conclusions Symptoms of altered faecal continence are significantly more common following forceps assisted vaginal delivery. Based on continence outcome, when circumstances allow, vacuum should be the instrument of first choice in assisted delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 429
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Obstetricians' personal choice and mode of delivery [J].
AlMufti, R ;
McCarthy, A ;
Fisk, NM .
LANCET, 1996, 347 (9000) :544-544
[2]   A randomized prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus the M-cup vacuum extractor [J].
Bofill, JA ;
Rust, OA ;
Schorr, SJ ;
Brown, RC ;
Martin, RW ;
Martin, JN ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (05) :1325-1330
[3]   THE PREVALENCE OF ANAL-SPHINCTER DEFECTS IN FECAL INCONTINENCE - A PROSPECTIVE ENDOSONIC STUDY [J].
DEEN, KI ;
KUMAR, D ;
WILLIAMS, JG ;
OLLIFF, J ;
KEIGHLEY, MRB .
GUT, 1993, 34 (05) :685-688
[4]   Obstetric events leading to anal sphincter damage [J].
Donnelly, V ;
Fynes, M ;
Campbell, D ;
Johnson, H ;
O'Connell, PR ;
O'Herlihy, C .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 92 (06) :955-961
[5]   Sequential use of instruments at operative vaginal delivery: Is it safe? [J].
Ezenagu, LC ;
Kakaria, R ;
Bofill, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 180 (06) :1446-1449
[6]   Influence of persistent occiput posterior position on delivery outcome [J].
Fitzpatrick, M ;
McQuillan, K ;
O'Herlihy, C .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (06) :1027-1031
[7]   Prospective study of the influence of parity and operative technique on the outcome of primary anal sphincter repair following obstetrical injury [J].
Fitzpatrick, M ;
Fynes, M ;
Cassidy, M ;
Behan, M ;
O'Connell, PR ;
O'Herlihy, C .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 89 (02) :159-163
[8]   Effect of second vaginal delivery on anorectal physiology and faecal continence: a prospective study [J].
Fynes, M ;
Donnelly, V ;
Behan, M ;
O'Connell, PR ;
O'Herlihy, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9183) :983-986
[9]   Anal vector volume analysis complements endoanal ultrasonographic assessment of postpartum anal sphincter injury [J].
Fynes, MM ;
Behan, M ;
O'Herlihy, C ;
O'Connell, PR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (09) :1209-1214
[10]   NORTH-STAFFORDSHIRE WIGAN ASSISTED DELIVERY TRIAL [J].
JOHANSON, R ;
PUSEY, J ;
LIVERA, N ;
JONES, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1989, 96 (05) :537-544