Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation - A randomized trial

被引:448
作者
Wik, L [1 ]
Hansen, TB
Fylling, F
Steen, T
Vaagenes, P
Auestad, BH
Steen, PA
机构
[1] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Expt Med Res Inst, Div Surg, N-0407 Oslo, Norway
[2] Norwegian Competence Ctr Emergency Med, Expt Med Res Inst, Oslo, Norway
[3] Norwegian Def Res Estab, Div Protect & Mat, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway
[4] Stavanger Univ Coll, Dept Technol & Nat Sci, Stavanger, Norway
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 289卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.289.11.1389
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Defibrillation as soon as possible is standard treatment for patients with ventricular fibrillation. A nonrandomized study indicates that after a few minutes of ventricular fibrillation, delaying defibrillation to give cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) first might improve the outcome. Objective To determine the effects of CPR before defibrillation on outcome in patients with ventricular fibrillation and with response times either up to or longer than 5 minutes. Design, Setting, and Patients Randomized trial of 200 patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation in Oslo, Norway, between June 1998 and May 2001. Patients received either standard care with immediate defibrillation (n = 96) or CPR first with 3 minutes of basic CPR by ambulance personnel prior to defibrillation (n = 104). If initial defibrillation was unsuccessful, the standard group received 1 minute of CPR, before additional defibrillation attempts compared with 3 minutes in the CPR first group. Main Outcome Measure Primary end point was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary end points were hospital admission with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 1-year survival, and neurological outcome. A prespecified analysis examined subgroups with response times either up to or longer than 5 minutes. Results In the standard group, 14 (15%) of 96 patients survived to hospital discharge vs 23 (22%) of 104 in the CPR first group (P=.17). There were no differences in ROSC rates between the standard group (56% [58/104]) and the CPR first group (46% [44/96]; P=.16); or in 1-year survival (20% [21/104] and 15% [14/96], respectively ; P=.30). In subgroup analysis or patients with ambulance response times of either up to 5 minutes or shorter, there were no differences in any outcome variables between the CPR first group (n=40) and the standard group (n=41). For patients with response intervals of longer than 5 minutes, more patients achieved ROSC in the CPR first group (58% [37/64]) compared with the standard group (38% [21/55]; odds ratio [OR], 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-4.63; P=.04); survival to hospital discharge (22% [14/64] vs 4% [2/55]; OR, 7.42; 95% CI, 1.61-34.3; P=.006); and 1-year survival (20% [13/64] vs 4% [2/55]; OR, 6.76; 95% CI, 1.42-31.4; P=.01). Thirty-three (89%) of 37 patients Who survived to hospital discharge had no or minor reductions in neurological status with no difference between the groups. Conclusions Compared with standard care for ventricular fibrillation, CPR first prior to defibrillation offered no advantage in improving outcomes for this entire study population or for patients with ambulance response times shorter than 5 minutes. However, the patients with ventricular fibrillation and ambulance response intervals longer than 5 minutes had better outcomes with CPR first before defibrillation was attempted. These results require confirmation in additional randomized trials.
引用
收藏
页码:1389 / 1395
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Resuscitation, V46, P73
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1964, DECL HELS
[3]  
*AUT EXT DEF ACLS, 1991, AM J EMERG MED, V9, P91
[4]   Signal analysis of the human electrocardiogram during ventricular fibrillation: Frequency and amplitude parameters as predictors of successful countershock [J].
Brown, CG ;
Dzwonczyk, R .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 27 (02) :184-188
[5]   HAWTHORNE EFFECT - IMPLICATIONS FOR PREHOSPITAL RESEARCH [J].
CAMPBELL, JP ;
MAXEY, VA ;
WATSON, WA .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1995, 26 (05) :590-594
[6]   Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation [J].
Cobb, LA ;
Fahrenbruch, CE ;
Walsh, TR ;
Copass, MK ;
Olsufka, M ;
Breskin, M ;
Hallstrom, AP .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (13) :1182-1188
[7]   RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR UNIFORM REPORTING OF DATA FROM OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC-ARREST - THE UTSTEIN STYLE - A STATEMENT FOR HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS FROM A TASK-FORCE OF THE AMERICAN-HEART-ASSOCIATION, THE EUROPEAN-RESUSCITATION-COUNCIL, THE HEART-AND-STROKE-FOUNDATION-OF-CANADA, AND THE AUSTRALIAN-RESUSCITATION-COUNCIL [J].
CUMMINS, RO ;
CHAMBERLAIN, DA ;
ABRAMSON, NS ;
ALLEN, M ;
BASKETT, PJ ;
BECKER, L ;
BOSSAERT, L ;
DELOOZ, HH ;
DICK, WF ;
EISENBERG, MS ;
EVANS, TR ;
HOLMBERG, S ;
KERBER, R ;
MULLIE, A ;
ORNATO, JP ;
SANDOE, E ;
SKULBERG, A ;
TUNSTALLPEDOE, H ;
SWANSON, R ;
THIES, WH .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 84 (02) :960-975
[8]   BUFFER THERAPY DURING OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION [J].
DYBVIK, T ;
STRAND, T ;
STEEN, PA .
RESUSCITATION, 1995, 29 (02) :89-95
[9]   Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest [J].
Eftestol, T ;
Sunde, K ;
Steen, PA .
CIRCULATION, 2002, 105 (19) :2270-2273
[10]  
Graves JR, 1997, RESUSCITATION, V35, P117