Multi-level approach to anaesthetic effects produced by sevoflurane or propofol in humans: 1. BIS and blink reflex

被引:40
作者
Mourisse, J.
Lerou, J.
Struys, M.
Zwarts, M.
Booij, L.
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Med, Dept Anaesthesia, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Anaesthesia, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Heymans Inst Pharmacol, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Ctr Med, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
anaesthetic volatile; sevoflurane; anaesthetics i.v; propofol; monitoring; bispectral index; depth of anaesthesia;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aem104
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The relative roles of forebrain and brainstem in producing adequate anaesthesia are unclear. Methods. We simultaneously analysed the effects of sevoflurane (Group S; n = 18) or propofol (Group P; n = 29) on the bispectral index (BIS) and the first component of the blink reflex (RI). The dose of anaesthetic agent was increased until loss of blink reflex. After discontinuation and reappearance of blink reflex activity, the amount was increased again. The area under curve RI (area-RI) of the electromyogram of the orbicularis oculi muscle after electrical stimulation of the supraorbital nerve was measured. Using a sigmoid Em. model and a first-order rate constant k(e0), we characterized the dose-response relationships for BIS and area-RI. Results. Concentration-dependent depression of BIS and area-RI was adequately modelled. The concentration that causes an effect midway between minimum and maximum (EC50) for area-RI was smaller than EC50 for BIS in both groups [0.34 (0.19) vs 1.29 (0.19) vol% and 1.78 (0.65) vs 2.69 (0.67) mu g ml(-1); mean (se)]. At doses of sevoflurane and propofol with equivalent depression of BIS, sevoflurane depressed area-RI more than propofol. The k(e0) for area-RI was about half that for BIS in both groups: 0.24 (0.19-0.29) vs 0.48 (0.38-0.60) min(-1) for Group S; 0.28 (0.23-0.34) vs 0.46 (0.40-0.54) min(-1) for Group P geometric mean (95% CI). Conclusions. The blink reflex (brainstem function) is more sensitive to sevoflurane or propofol than BIS (forebrain function). Sevoflurane suppresses the blink reflex more than propofol. Different k(e0)s for blink reflex vs BIS indicate different effect sites.
引用
收藏
页码:737 / 745
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   In vivo characterization of clinical anaesthesia and its components [J].
Antognini, JF ;
Carstens, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 89 (01) :156-166
[2]   The late blink reflex response abnormality due to lesion of the lateral tegmental field [J].
Aramideh, M ;
deVisser, BWO ;
Koelman, JHTM ;
Majoie, CBL ;
Holstege, G .
BRAIN, 1997, 120 :1685-1692
[3]   Concentration-dependent suppression of F-waves by sevoflurane does not predict immobility to painful stimuli in humans [J].
Baars, JH ;
Kalisch, D ;
Herold, KF ;
Hadzidiakos, DA ;
Rehberg, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 95 (06) :789-797
[4]   Suppression of the human spinal H-reflex by propofol: a quantitative analysis [J].
Baars, JH ;
Dangel, C ;
Herold, KF ;
Hadzidiakos, DA ;
Rehberg, B .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 50 (02) :193-200
[5]  
CHERNIK DA, 1990, J CLIN PSYCHOPHARM, V10, P244
[6]   Sevoflurane and epileptiform EEG changes [J].
Constant, I ;
Seeman, R ;
Murat, I .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2005, 15 (04) :266-274
[7]   NOCICEPTIVE QUALITY OF THE ORBICULARIS OCULI REFLEXES AS EVALUATED BY DISTINCT OPIATE-INDUCED AND BENZODIAZEPINE-INDUCED CHANGES IN MAN [J].
CRUCCU, G ;
FERRACUTI, S ;
LEARDI, MG ;
FABBRI, A ;
MANFREDI, M .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1991, 556 (02) :209-217
[8]  
Ellerkmann RK, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V101, P1275
[9]   The R3 component of the blink reflex: Normative data and application in spinal lesions [J].
Ellrich, J ;
Hopf, HC .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 101 (04) :349-354
[10]   Bispectral Index Monitoring during Sedation with Sevoflurane, Midazolam, and Propofol [J].
Ibrahim, AE ;
Taraday, JK ;
Kharasch, ED .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2001, 95 (05) :1151-1159