The use of cell salvage during radical retropubic prostatectomy: does it influence cancer recurrence?

被引:57
作者
Davis, M
Sofer, M
Gomez-Marin, O
Bruck, D
Soloway, MS
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Miami, FL USA
[2] Univ Miami, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol, Miami, FL USA
关键词
prostate; cancer; prostatectomy; transfusion;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04129.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To assess whether there is a difference in the biochemical recurrence rate in patients who had radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with or without cell salvage transfusion. The records of 769 consecutive patients undergoing RRP between 1992 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients having adjuvant hormonal treatment, postoperative external beam radiotherapy, or a follow-up of < 1 year were excluded from the analysis. The remaining 408 patients were categorized into three groups: 87 who received cell-salvaged blood using a commercial cell saver; 264 receiving only autologous transfusion; and 57 with no transfusion. Disease recurrence was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of > 0.2 ng/mL. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess and compare the risk of cancer recurrence in the three groups. Covariates used in the multivariate analyses included Gleason score, preoperative PSA level, seminal vesicle involvement and surgical margins. The mean (range) follow-up was 40.2 (12-104) months; there were no significant differences among the groups in initial PSA level and Gleason score. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the initial PSA, Gleason score, seminal vesicle involvement and surgical margins, but not transfusion group, were independent predictors of recurrence. Cell salvage during RRP does not influence the recurrence of prostate cancer. Cell salvage is a safe method of transfusion during RRP.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / U22
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, CAMBELLS UROLOGY
[2]  
BLUMBERG N, 1994, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V118, P371
[3]   The potential for reintroduction of tumor cells during intraoperative blood salvage: Reduction of risk with use of the RC-400 leukocyte depletion filter [J].
Edelman, MJ ;
Potter, P ;
Mahaffey, KG ;
Frink, R ;
Leidich, RB .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (02) :179-181
[4]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLOOD-TRANSFUSION AND TUMOR BEHAVIOR [J].
FRANCIS, DMA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 78 (12) :1420-1428
[5]   RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY - LIMITED BENEFIT OF AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD DONATION [J].
GOAD, JR ;
EASTHAM, JA ;
FITZGERALD, KB ;
KATTAN, MW ;
COLLINI, MP ;
YAWN, DH ;
SCARDINO, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (06) :2103-2109
[6]   Autologous blood donation prior to anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: Is it necessary? [J].
Goh, M ;
Kleer, CG ;
Kielczewski, P ;
Wojno, KJ ;
Kim, K ;
Oesterling, JE .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (04) :569-573
[7]  
HART OJ, 1989, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V168, P302
[8]   INTRAOPERATIVE AUTOTRANSFUSION IN UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY [J].
KLIMBERG, I ;
SIROIS, R ;
WAJSMAN, Z ;
BAKER, J .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1986, 121 (11) :1326-1329
[9]   Use of preoperative autologous blood donation in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
O'Hara, JF ;
Sprung, J ;
Klein, EA ;
Dilger, JA ;
Domen, RE ;
Piedmonte, MR .
UROLOGY, 1999, 54 (01) :130-134
[10]   USE OF PREDEPOSIT AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD AND INTRAOPERATIVE AUTOTRANSFUSION IN UROLOGIC CANCER-SURGERY [J].
PISTERS, LL ;
WAJSMAN, Z .
UROLOGY, 1992, 40 (03) :211-215