Neoplasm staging and organ-confined renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review

被引:28
作者
Ficarra, V
Novara, G
Galfano, A
Artibani, W
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Cattedra Clinicizzata Urol, Osped Policlin, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Div Clinicizzata Urol, Osped Policlin, I-37134 Verona, Italy
关键词
neoplasm staging; renal cell carcinoma; TNM classification; localized tumor;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2004.07.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Several TNM staging system editions were published over the years for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Using a search strategy similar to the one used by the TNM process Subcommittee for "literature watch", we searched MEDLINE with the intent to critically analyze literature concerning the different TNM editions and the data regarding the optimal breakpoints to substratify localized RCC. Material and methods: The electronic search was conducted as follows: "Neoplasm staging" [MeSH] AND "Carcinoma, Renal Cell" [MeSH]. At the end of a process of abstract analysis performed separately by three of the authors. 34 papers were included in the systematic review. Results: All the 34 selected papers were retrospective studies. According to the 1987 version of TNM classification, no paper showed statistically significant cancer-specific survival probability differences between stage I and stage II RCC. According to the 1997 TNM version, the results were controversial. While a few papers found significantly different cancer-specific survival rates between stage I and stage II RCC, several others failed to do so. With the aim to stratify patients with localized RCC, most of the papers proposed an ideal breakpoint ranging from 4.5 to 5.5 cm. Conclusion: This literature review highlighted that a correct definition of the staging of organ-confined RCC was far from being achieved and provided an appropriate synopsis of the available data for further update of the TNM staging system. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 564
页数:6
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] Prognostic factors in patients with renal cell carcinoma: Retrospective analysis of 675 cases
    Ficarra, V
    Righetti, R
    Pilloni, S
    D'amico, A
    Maffei, N
    Novella, G
    Zanolla, L
    Malossini, G
    Mobilio, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2002, 41 (02) : 190 - 198
  • [12] Fiori E, 2002, J EXP CLIN CANC RES, V21, P229
  • [13] MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS OF THE KIDNEY - AN ANALYSIS OF 353 PATIENTS FOLLOWED 5 YEARS OR MORE
    FLOCKS, RH
    KADESKY, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1958, 79 (02) : 196 - 201
  • [14] An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: The SSIGN score
    Frank, I
    Blute, ML
    Cheville, JC
    Lohse, CM
    Weaver, AL
    Zincke, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (06) : 2395 - 2400
  • [15] STAGE-I RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - A CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF 82 CASES
    GELB, AB
    SHIBUYA, RB
    WEISS, LM
    MEDEIROS, LJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1993, 17 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [16] Update on pathologic staging of renal cell carcinoma
    Gettman, MT
    Blute, ML
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (02) : 209 - 217
  • [17] Gettman MT, 2001, CANCER, V91, P354, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010115)91:2<354::AID-CNCR1009>3.0.CO
  • [18] 2-9
  • [19] Giberti C, 1997, EUR UROL, V31, P40
  • [20] Renal cell carcinoma: Evaluation of the 1997 TNM system and recommendations for follow-up after surgery
    Gofrit, ON
    Shapiro, A
    Kovalski, N
    Landau, EH
    Shenfeld, OZ
    Pode, D
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) : 669 - 674