Absence of multiple local minima effects in intensity modulated optimization with dose-volume constraints

被引:49
作者
Llacer, J
Deasy, JO
Bortfeld, TR
Solberg, TD
Promberger, C
机构
[1] EC Engn Cosultants, Los Gatos, CA 95032 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[6] BrainLAB AG, D-85551 Heimstetten, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/48/2/304
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This paper reports on the analysis of intensity modulated radiation treatment optimization problems in the presence of non-convex feasible parameter spaces caused by the specification of dose-volume constraints for the organs-at-risk (OARs). The main aim was to determine whether the presence of those non-convex spaces affects the optimization of clinical cases in any significant way. This was done in two phases: (1) Using a carefully designed two-dimensional mathematical phantom that exhibits two controllable minima and with randomly initialized beamlet weights, we developed a methodology for exploring the nature of the convergence characteristics of quadratic cost function optimizations (deterministic or stochastic). The methodology is based on observing the statistical behaviour of the residual cost at the end of optimizations in which the stopping criterion is progressively more demanding and carrying out those optimizations to very small error changes per iteration. (2) Seven clinical cases were then analysed with dose-volume constraints that are stronger than originally used in the clinic. The clinical cases are two prostate cases differently posed, a meningioma case, two head-and-neck cases, a spleen case and a spine case. Of the 14 different sets of optimizations (with and without the specification of maximum doses allowed for the OARs), 12 fail to show any effect due to the existence of non-convex feasible spaces. The remaining two sets of optimizations show evidence of multiple minima in the solutions, but those minima are very close to each other in cost and the resulting treatment plans are practically identical, as measured by the quality of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs). We discuss the differences between fluence maps resulting from those similar treatment plans. We provide a possible reason for the observed results and conclude that, although the study is necessarily limited, the annealing characteristics of a simulated annealing method may not be justified in clinical optimization in the presence of dose-volume constraints. The results of optimizations by the Newton gradient (NG) method with a quadratic cost function are reported in detail. An adaptive simulated annealing method, optimizing the same function, and the dynamically penalized likelihood method, optimizing a log likelihood function, have also been used in the Study. The results of the latter two methods have only been discussed briefly, as they yielded the same conclusions as the NG method.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 210
页数:28
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   On the degeneracy of the IMRT optimization problem [J].
Alber, M ;
Meedt, G ;
Nüsslin, F ;
Reemtsen, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (11) :2584-2589
[2]  
Bortfeld T, 1997, PROCEEDINGS OF THE XIITH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, P1
[3]   METHODS OF IMAGE-RECONSTRUCTION FROM PROJECTIONS APPLIED TO CONFORMATION RADIOTHERAPY [J].
BORTFELD, T ;
BURKELBACH, J ;
BOESECKE, R ;
SCHLEGEL, W .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 35 (10) :1423-1434
[4]  
BORTFELD T, 1995, THESIS U HEIDELBERG
[5]   Multiple local minima in radiotherapy optimization problems with dose-volume constraints [J].
Deasy, JO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (07) :1157-1161
[6]   Comparative behaviour of the Dynamically Penalized Likelihood algorithm in inverse radiation therapy planning [J].
Llacer, J ;
Solberg, TD ;
Promberger, C .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2001, 46 (10) :2637-2663
[7]   Configuration space analysis of common cost functions in radiotherapy beam-weight optimization algorithms [J].
Rowbottom, CG ;
Webb, S .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (01) :65-77
[8]   A simple model for examining issues in radiotherapy optimization [J].
Shepard, DM ;
Olivera, G ;
Angelos, L ;
Sauer, O ;
Reckwerdt, P ;
Mackie, TR .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (07) :1212-1221
[9]  
SOLLA SA, 1986, DISORDERED SYSTEMS B, P283
[10]   OPTIMIZING RADIATION-THERAPY INVERSE TREATMENT PLANNING USING THE SIMULATED ANNEALING TECHNIQUE [J].
WEBB, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 6 (01) :71-79