Conflict resolution in passive formation

被引:6
作者
Ackema, P
Neeleman, A
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, BCN, NL-9700 AS Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ London Univ Coll, Dept Phonet & Linguist, London WC1E 6BT, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0024-3841(97)00022-3
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
In this paper we will argue that a typology of passive formation can be derived from the optimality-theoretic interaction between three well-known constraints. These are the Extended Projection Principle (VP must have a subject), Stay (do not move) and Parse (elements from the input should occur in the output). The analysis will not only account for different forms of passives (personal passives versus impersonal passives) but also for languages which lack passives (of certain verbs or altogether). To account for this we employ the so-called null parse, a candidate without structure.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 29
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[31]  
NEELEMAN A, 1996, CASE INTERPRETATION
[32]  
Perlmutter D. M., 1978, Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, V4, P157, DOI [DOI 10.3765/BLS.V4I0.2198, 10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198]
[33]  
Perlmutter David M., 1984, STUDIES RELATIONAL G, V2, P126
[34]  
PRINCE A, 1993, IN PRESS LINGUISTICS
[35]  
REINHART T, 1995, WH INSITU FRAMEWORK
[36]  
Rizzi L., 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax
[37]  
SAMEKLODOVICI V, 1996, THESI RUTGERS U
[38]  
Siewierska Anna, 1984, Passive: A comparative linguistic analysis
[39]  
Stowell T., 1981, ORIGINS PHRASE STRUC
[40]  
WEERMAN F, 1992, EEN OPMERKING CASUST