Maternal and fetal genetic factors account for most of familial aggregation of preeclampsia: A population-based Swedish cohort study

被引:213
作者
Cnattingius, S [1 ]
Reilly, M [1 ]
Pawitan, Y [1 ]
Lichtenstein, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Epidemiol & Biostat, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A | 2004年 / 130A卷 / 04期
关键词
environment; genes; preeclampsia; pregnancy; risk factors;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.30257
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
There is accumulated evidence for genetic influences on preeclampsia. However, no study has been able to separate the effects of maternal and fetal genetic factors from environmental factors, and there are still uncertainties about the origin and magnitude of the genetic effects. We used the population-based Swedish Birth and Multi-Generation Registries to identify a cohort of women who gave birth from 1987 through 1997. In order to separate the genetic and environmental contributions to preeclampsia, we analyzed pregnancy outcomes from families joined by full siblings. We included information from 244,564 sibling pairs (62,236 sister pairs, 63,288 brother pairs, and 119,040 sister-brother pairs), who had 701,488 pregnancies. We found that 35% of the variance in liability of preeclampsia was attributable to maternal genetic effects, 20% to fetal genetic effects (with similar contribution of maternal and paternal genetic effects), 13% to the couple effect, less than 1% to shared sibling environment, and 32% to unmeasured factors. Among women and men without a history of preclampsia, partner change reduced the risk of preeclampsia (odds ratio, 0.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.4-0.9). Genetic factors account for more than half of the liability of preeclampsia, and maternal genes contribute more than fetal genes. We suggest that the couple effect is due to a genetic interaction between mother and father. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 371
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[21]  
LUNDE AS, 1980, PHS801358 DEP HLTH H, P5
[22]   Familial occurrence of preeclampsia [J].
Mogren, I ;
Högberg, U ;
Winkvist, A ;
Stenlund, H .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (05) :518-522
[23]   Preeclampsia in the parous woman: Who is at risk? [J].
Mostello, D ;
Catlin, TK ;
Roman, L ;
Holcomb, WL ;
Leet, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (02) :425-429
[24]   Risk factors and clinical manifestations of pre-eclampsia [J].
Odegård, RA ;
Vatten, LJ ;
Nilsen, ST ;
Salvesen, KÅ ;
Austgulen, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (11) :1410-1416
[25]  
PAWITAN Y, 2001, ALL LIKELIHOOD MODEL
[26]   PATERNITY PATTERNS AND RISK OF PREECLAMPSIA IN THE LAST PREGNANCY IN MULTIPARAE [J].
ROBILLARD, PY ;
HULSEY, TC ;
ALEXANDER, GR ;
KEENAN, A ;
DECAUNES, F ;
PAPIERNIK, E .
JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 24 (01) :1-12
[27]   Revisiting the epidemiological standard of preeclampsia: primigravidity or primipaternity? [J].
Robillard, PY ;
Dekker, GA ;
Hulsey, TC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1999, 84 (01) :37-41
[28]  
Ros HS, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V147, P1062
[29]  
SALONEN RH, 2000, AM J MED GENET, V91, P256
[30]   THE EFFECT OF ABORTION ON THE INCIDENCE OF PRE-ECLAMPSIA [J].
SEIDMAN, DS ;
EVERHADANI, P ;
STEVENSON, DK ;
GALE, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1989, 33 (02) :109-114