Detection of retinal lesions after telemedicine transmission of digital images

被引:8
作者
Cook, HL [1 ]
Heacock, GL [1 ]
Stanford, MR [1 ]
Marshall, J [1 ]
机构
[1] GKT Sch, Dept Ophthalmol, London, England
关键词
digital image; image resolution; observer accuracy; retinal lesions; scanning laser ophthalmoscopy; telemedicine;
D O I
10.1038/eye.2000.144
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose/background To assess whether loss of image resolution or colour and subsequent telemedicine transmission of digital images affects the accuracy of retinal lesion detection by ophthalmologists when compared with the original transparencies. Methods Fifteen ophthalmologists of different experience independently scored 11 retinal images for pathological signs. The images were presented as either transparencies or colour and monochrome digital images, which had been transmitted via telephone lines to a geographically remote location. One patient's eye was also imaged using scanning laser ophthalmosocopy (SLO) which produced a dynamic black and white digital image. ANOVA analysis was performed. Results Total scores were higher for transparencies than colour (p = 0.0003) or black and white digital images (p = 0.00006). Expert observers (n = 5) considered separately showed no significant difference of accuracy between transparencies and either colour digital (p = 0.09) or monochrome digital images (p = 0.11). Experts were better than trainees at detecting pathology from less familiar images: total score (I, = 0.02), colour digital (p = 0.03), monochrome digital (p = 0.02) and SLO images (p = 0.004). Conclusion Experienced observers can identify sight-threatening retinal pathology from poorer-resolution digital images that have been transmitted by telemedicine. They can also adapt to viewing less familiar images such as black and white digital or SLO images.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 571
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Amos AF, 1997, DIABETIC MED, V14, pS7, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199712)14:5+<S7::AID-DIA522>3.3.CO
  • [2] 2-I
  • [3] Andersen E B, 1995, Ugeskr Laeger, V157, P2155
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1967, EPH546 BRIT DIAB ASS
  • [5] Black-Schaffer S, 1995, Telemed J, V1, P95, DOI 10.1089/tmj.1.1995.1.95
  • [6] BLOOM KJ, 1987, SPIE P VISUAL COMMUN, V845, P408
  • [7] EVALUATING HEALTH SCREENING PROCEDURES
    BLUMBERG, MS
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1957, 5 (03) : 351 - 360
  • [8] DIGITAL AND CONVENTIONAL CHEST IMAGING - A MODIFIED ROC STUDY OF OBSERVER PERFORMANCE USING SIMULATED NODULES
    CHAKRABORTY, DP
    BREATNACH, ES
    YESTER, MV
    SOTO, B
    BARNES, GT
    FRASER, RG
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1986, 158 (01) : 35 - 39
  • [9] CHEST RADIOGRAPHY - COMPARISON OF HIGH-RESOLUTION DIGITAL DISPLAYS WITH CONVENTIONAL AND DIGITAL FILM
    COX, GG
    COOK, LT
    MCMILLAN, JH
    ROSENTHAL, SJ
    DWYER, SJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (03) : 771 - 776
  • [10] deSonnaville JJJ, 1996, DIABETIC MED, V13, P482, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199605)13:5<482::AID-DIA95>3.0.CO