Follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta -: Comparison of helical CT and MRI, and impact on assessing diameter changes

被引:25
作者
Hager, A [1 ]
Kaemmerer, H
Leppert, A
Prokop, M
Blücher, S
Stern, H
Hess, J
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klin Kinderkardiol & Angeborene Herzfehler, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, D-80636 Munich, Germany
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Hannover, Germany
[3] Univ Vienna, Univ Klin Radiodiagnost, Vienna, Austria
关键词
aortic coaretation; helical CT; MRI; thoracic aorta; thoracic aortic aneurysm;
D O I
10.1378/chest.126.4.1169
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare images of the aorta obtained with helical CT (HCT) scanning and MRI for the follow-up of adults with coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Design: Longitudinal study. Setting: Department of adult congenital heart disease in a tertiary university hospital. Patients: A total of 37 adults (age range, 16 to 68 years; women, 13) with CoA (after surgery, 34 patients; native, 2 patients; after balloon-angioplasty, 1 patient) Measurements and results: All patients underwent both HCT and MRI of the thoracic aorta within a mean (+/- SD) time interval of 1.86 +/- 1.11 years. Aortic diameters measured at six intrathoracic levels showed a high correlation (r = 0.79 to 0.94). On average, slightly lower diameters were measured with MRI (1.2 mm). But there was a substantial variation between the two measurements with differences of up to 9 mm. All other pathomorphologic abnormalities were detected and classified similarly with both methods. Conclusions: HCT and MRI are similarly useful for the noninvasive evaluation of the thoracic aorta in patients with CoA. But there can be a substantial variation in two subsequent measurements without an overall substantial bias toward larger diameter in one of the two methods. In repetitive studies, changes of the diameters should be interpreted with care, especially when assessing the progression of aortic diameters.
引用
收藏
页码:1169 / 1176
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   COARCTATION OF THE AORTA IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING ANGIOPLASTY - PRETREATMENT AND POSTTREATMENT MR IMAGING [J].
BANK, ER ;
AISEN, AM ;
ROCCHINI, AP ;
HERNANDEZ, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (01) :235-240
[2]   Spiral CT angiography and 3D reconstruction in patients with aortic coarctation [J].
Becker, C ;
Soppa, C ;
Fink, U ;
Haubner, M ;
MullerLisse, U ;
Englmeier, KH ;
Buhlmeyer, K ;
Reiser, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (09) :1473-1477
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   One- to ten-year follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of native coarctation of the aorta in adolescents and adults [J].
Fawzy, ME ;
Sivanandam, V ;
Galal, O ;
Dunn, B ;
Patel, A ;
Rifai, A ;
vonSinner, W ;
AlHalees, Z ;
Khan, B .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 30 (06) :1542-1546
[5]   Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging in coarctation of the aorta: The importance of multiple imaging planes [J].
Greenberg, SB ;
Marks, LA ;
Eshaghpour, EE .
PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 18 (05) :345-349
[6]   Effects of morphologic restenosis, defined by MRI after coarctation repair, on blood pressure and arm-leg and Doppler gradients [J].
Gunthard, J ;
Buser, PT ;
Miettunen, R ;
Hagmann, A ;
Wyler, F .
ANGIOLOGY, 1996, 47 (11) :1073-1080
[7]   Diameters of the thoracic aorta throughout life as measured with helical computed tomography [J].
Hager, A ;
Kaemmerer, H ;
Rapp-Bernhardt, U ;
Blücher, S ;
Rapp, K ;
Bernhardt, TM ;
Galanski, M ;
Hess, J .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 123 (06) :1060-1066
[8]   ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart [J].
Kachelriess, M ;
Ulzheimer, S ;
Kalender, WA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) :1881-1902
[9]  
KAEMMERER H, 1994, Z KARDIOL, V83, P775
[10]   FOLLOW-UP USING MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN ADULT PATIENTS AFTER SURGERY FOR AORTIC COARCTATION [J].
KAEMMERER, H ;
THEISSEN, P ;
KONIG, U ;
SECHTEM, U ;
DEVIVIE, ER .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 1993, 41 (02) :107-111