The use of stimulus-biased assay systems to detect agonist-specific receptor active states: Implications for the trafficking of receptor stimulus by agonists

被引:88
作者
Watson, C
Chen, G
Irving, P
Way, J
Chen, WJ
Kenakin, T
机构
[1] Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Res & Dev, Dept Receptor Biochem, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Glaxo Wellcome Inc, Res & Dev, Dept Mol Sci, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1124/mol.58.6.1230
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The quantitative comparison of the relative potency of agonists is a standard method of receptor and agonist classification. If agonist potency ratios do not correspond in two given tissues, this is used as presumptive data to conclude that the receptors in those two tissues are different. This article presents data to show that a single receptor can demonstrate varying agonist potency ratios in different host cells. These data are described in terms of the production of more than one agonist-selective receptor active state and the interaction of these different active states with multiple G proteins in the membrane to produce cellular response. Stable host human embryonic kidney 293 cells with enhanced quantities of the respective G alpha -protein were created. Wild-type and G alpha -subunit enriched cells were then transiently transfected with human calcitonin receptor type 2 (hCTR2). Binding did not detect differences in the G protein-enriched cells versus wild-type cells. In contrast, functional studies did show differences between the host cell lines and G alpha -subunit enriched cell lines. The relative potency of eight calcitonin agonists was measured in studies of calcium fluorescence in transfected cells containing human calcitonin receptor type 2 by comparing pEC(50) (-log molar concentration producing half-maximal response) values. In G alphas-enriched cells, the relative order of potency of the agonists changed. The host-cell dependent differences in potency ratios ranged from 2-fold to more than 46-fold. This finding is not consistent with the idea that all of the agonists produce response in the same manner (i.e., through a common active state of the receptor). These data are consistent with the idea that these different agonists produce arrays of active states that differentially use G proteins. This idea is discussed in terms of the design of stimulus-bias assay systems to detect agonist-selective receptor active states with resulting potential for increased selectivity of agonists.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1238
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   AGONIST-SPECIFIC COUPLING OF A CLONED DROSOPHILA OCTOPAMINE TYRAMINE RECEPTOR TO MULTIPLE 2ND MESSENGER SYSTEMS [J].
ROBB, S ;
CHEEK, TR ;
HANNAN, FL ;
HALL, LM ;
MIDGLEY, JM ;
EVANS, PD .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1994, 13 (06) :1325-1330
[22]   DEDUCED PRIMARY STRUCTURE OF THE ALPHA-SUBUNIT OF THE GTP-BINDING STIMULATORY PROTEIN OF ADENYLATE-CYCLASE [J].
ROBISHAW, JD ;
RUSSELL, DW ;
HARRIS, BA ;
SMIGEL, MD ;
GILMAN, AG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1986, 83 (05) :1251-1255
[23]  
SAMAMA P, 1993, J BIOL CHEM, V268, P4625
[24]   Effects of guanine, inosine, and xanthine nucleotides on β2-adrenergic receptor/Gs interactions:: Evidence for multiple receptor conformations [J].
Seifert, R ;
Gether, U ;
Wenzel-Seifert, K ;
Kobilka, BK .
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 56 (02) :348-358
[25]  
SNEDECOR GW, 1967, STATISTICAL METHODS, P160
[26]  
SPENGLER D, 1993, NATURE, V365, P170, DOI 10.1038/365170a0
[27]   G-PROTEIN DIVERSITY - A DISTINCT CLASS OF ALPHA-SUBUNITS IS PRESENT IN VERTEBRATES AND INVERTEBRATES [J].
STRATHMANN, M ;
SIMON, MI .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (23) :9113-9117
[28]  
vanHooft JA, 1996, BRIT J PHARMACOL, V117, P839
[29]   Gi activator region of α2A-adrenergic receptors:: Distinct basic residues mediate Gi versus Gs activation [J].
Wade, SM ;
Lim, WK ;
Lan, KL ;
Chung, DA ;
Nanamori, M ;
Neubig, RR .
MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 56 (05) :1005-1013
[30]   The cubic ternary complex receptor-occupancy model .2. Understanding apparent affinity [J].
Weiss, JM ;
Morgan, PH ;
Lutz, MW ;
Kenakin, TP .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1996, 178 (02) :169-182